Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33709851›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2021

Belief in Unconscious Repressed Memory Persists.

Henry Otgaar, Mark L Howe, Olivier Dodier, Scott O Lilienfeld, Elizabeth F Loftus, Steven Jay Lynn, Harald Merckelbach, Lawrence Patihis

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Henry OtgaarFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Section of Forensic Psychology, Maastricht University.ORCID 0000-0002-2782-2181
Mark L HoweFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Section of Forensic Psychology, Maastricht University.
Olivier DodierDepartment of Psychology, University of Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8855-6860
Scott O LilienfeldDepartment of Psychology, Emory University.ORCID 0000-0003-4501-8629
Elizabeth F LoftusDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine.
Steven Jay LynnLaboratory of Consciousness, Cognition, and Psychopathology, Binghamton University.
Harald MerckelbachFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Section of Forensic Psychology, Maastricht University.ORCID 0000-0002-5116-7826
Lawrence PatihisDepartment of Psychology, University of Portsmouth.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-8986

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On the basis of converging research, we concluded that the controversial topic of unconscious blockage of psychological trauma (i.e., repressed memory) remains very much alive in clinical, legal, and academic contexts. In his commentary, Brewin (this issue, p. 443) conducted a cocitation analysis and concluded that scholars do not adhere to the concept of unconscious repression. Furthermore, he argued that previous survey research did not specifically assess

Indexed as

Psychological TraumaRepression, PsychologyHumansMaleMemory Disordersfalse memorymemory warsrepressed memoryunconscious

Identifiers

PMID33709851
PMCPMC7961636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.