ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2021
Comparison of
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precise localization of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor causing tumor-induced osteomalacia: the value of dual-tracer imaging with ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT.EJNMMI reports · 2026Article
- Hypophosphatemic osteomalacia caused by diffuse tenosynovial giant cell tumor misdiagnosed as spondyloarthritis: a case report.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Tumor induced-osteomalacia caused by a phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor in the sartorius muscle: a case report.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Surgical treatment as a key determinant of outcome in phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors of the bone and soft tissue: a systematic review and case series.EFORT open reviews · 2025Article
- Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor demonstrated byEJNMMI reports · 2024Article
- Diagnostic accuracy ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess and compare the performance of fluorine-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (
methodsThis was a clinical retrospective analysis. We analyzed 13 patients (five men, eight women; mean age, 49 years; range, 19-55 years) with suspicion of tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) between March 2017 and October 2019. All patients underwent two functional imaging methods to locate the culprittumors. Studies were performed on a PET/CT scanner. The injection doses of
resultsAll patients had symptoms of osteomalacia and hypophosphatemia. The lag time (symptoms to PET diagnosis) ranged from 2 to 12 years. There were eight cases of TIO patients and five cases of non-TIO patients confirmed by surgery, pathology and follow-up. Among the eight TIO patients, there were six cases (75.0%) of PMTs, one case (12.5%) of giant cell tumor, one case (12.5%) of hemangiopericutoma. Most (n = 6, 75.0%) of the confirmed tumors in our patient population were in the lower extremities, followed by craniofacial regions (n = 1, 12.5%), and torso (n = 1, 12.5%), respectively. Among the five non-TIO patients, there were two cases of Fanconi syndrome, one case of rickets, and two cases of sporadic osteomalacia hypophosphorus. The culprit tumors could be located either in the bone (n = 5, 62.5%) or the soft tissue (n = 3, 37.5%).
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.