Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33709343›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021

A call to action: unified clinical practice guidelines for oncofertility care.

Jacqueline Sehring, Anisa Hussain, Lauren Grimm, Elisabeth Rosen, Jody Esguerra, Karine Matevossian, Erica Louden, Angeline Beltsos, Roohi Jeelani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Evaluating fertility preservation interventions for alignment with ASCO Guidelines for reproductive aged women undergoing cancer treatment: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Barriers to and Facilitators of Shared Decision-Making Implementation in Fertility Preservation for Patients With Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jacqueline SehringVios Fertility Institute, 1455 N Milwaukee Ave, Chicago, IL, 60622, USA. sehring.jacqueline@gmail.com.
Anisa HussainVios Fertility Institute, 1455 N Milwaukee Ave, Chicago, IL, 60622, USA.
Lauren GrimmVios Fertility Institute, 1455 N Milwaukee Ave, Chicago, IL, 60622, USA.
Elisabeth RosenVios Fertility Institute, 1455 N Milwaukee Ave, Chicago, IL, 60622, USA.
Jody EsguerraVios Fertility Institute, 1455 N Milwaukee Ave, Chicago, IL, 60622, USA.
Karine MatevossianAdvocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, USA.
Erica LoudenVios Fertility Institute, 1455 N Milwaukee Ave, Chicago, IL, 60622, USA.
Angeline BeltsosVios Fertility Institute, 1455 N Milwaukee Ave, Chicago, IL, 60622, USA.
Roohi JeelaniVios Fertility Institute, 1455 N Milwaukee Ave, Chicago, IL, 60622, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By 2030, WHO estimates that 1.4 million reproductive-aged women will be diagnosed with cancer annually. Fortunately, cancer is no longer considered an incurable disease in many cases. From 2008-2014, 85% of women under the age of 45 years diagnosed with cancer survived. This increase in survival rate has shifted attention from focusing exclusively on preserving life to focusing on preserving quality of life after treatment. One aspect of this is preserving the ability to have a biological family. Oncofertility, the field that bridges oncology and reproductive endocrinology with the goal of preserving fertility, offers these patients hope. Though it is clear that ASCO and ASRM recognize the importance of fertility preservation as an aspect of comprehensive oncology care, there are not yet unified guidelines for oncologists and fertility specialists for treating oncofertility patients. First, we identify the need for reproductive counseling prior to cancer treatment, as many patients report that their fertility preservation concerns are not addressed adequately. We then delineate multi-modal fertility preservation options that are available and appropriate for different patients with corresponding outcomes using different treatments. We discuss the unique challenges and considerations, including ethical dilemmas, for delivering timely and comprehensive care specifically for oncofertility patients. Finally, we address the multidisciplinary team that includes oncologists, reproductive endocrinologists, surgeons as well as their staff, nurses, genetic counselors, mental health professionals, and more. Since oncofertility patient care requires the coordination of both physician teams, one set of unified guidelines will greatly improve quality of care.

Indexed as

AdultCounselingCryopreservationEndocrinologistsFemaleFertility PreservationHealth PersonnelHumansInfertilityMaleNeoplasmsOvarian Hyperstimulation SyndromeOvulation InductionPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyQuality of LifeClinical guidelinesFertility preservationOncofertilityReproductive counseling

Identifiers

PMID33709343
PMCPMC8324617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.