ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2021
Retrospective European Multicentric Evaluation of Selective Transarterial Chemoembolisation with and without Balloon-Occlusion in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Quantitative literature analysis on efficacy and safety of balloon-occluded transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Balloon-Occlusion Versus End-Hole Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Review
- Review
- Balloon-Occluded Transarterial Chemoembolization for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2026Article
- Arterial and biliary complications after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Efficacy of B-TACE Versus C-TACE and Potential Predictive Value of Intraoperative Balloon-Occluded Stump Pressure in HCC.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Balloon-Occluded Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Technical Rationale, Current Evidence, and Future Directions.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Review
- Pressure Gradient-Driven Embolization b-TACE for HCC: Technical and Diagnostic Step-by-Step Procedural Guide and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Gastrointestinal side effects in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization: a meta-analysis of 81 studies and 9495 patients.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of Balloon TACE for HCC: An European Multicentre Single-Arm Retrospective Study.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024Article
- Efficacy and features of balloon-occluded transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Review
- Preoperative Balloon-Occluded Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Followed by Surgical Resection: Pathological Evaluation of Necrosis.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Balloon-occluded transarterial chemoembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.European radiology · 2023Article
- Interventional oncology of liver tumors: how it all started and where are we now.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Editorial of Special Issue "Embolization Techniques: State of the Art and Future Perspectives".Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Single medium-sized hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sequential conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and microwave ablation at 4 weeks versus cTACE alone: a propensity score.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- CIRSE Standards of Practice on Hepatic Transarterial Chemoembolisation.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2021Article
- In the Era of Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is Transarterial Chemoembolization Still a Card to Play?Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this retrospective multicentric study was to compare the tumour response rates of Balloon-occluded Transarterial Chemoembolisation (B-TACE) to non-B-TACE using propensity score matching (PSM) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and to investigate the clinical benefit, such as lower rates of TACE re-intervention achieved using B-TACE. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe B-TACE procedures (n = 96 patients) were compared with a control group of non-B-TACE treatments (n = 434 pts), performed with conventional (cTACE) or drug-eluting microspheres TACE (DEM-TACE). Data were collected from six European centres from 2015 to 2019. Objective responses (OR) and complete response (CR) rates after the first session and the number of TACE re-interventions were evaluated using PSM (91 patients per arm).
resultsThe best target OR after PSM were similar for both B-TACE and non-B-TACE (90.1% and 86.8%, p = 0.644); however, CR at 1-6 months was significantly higher for B-TACE (59.3% vs. 41.8%, p = 0.026). Patients treated with B-TACE had a significantly lower retreatment rate during the first 6 months (9.9%% vs. 22.0%, p = 0.041). Post-embolisation syndrome (PES) rates were 8.8% in non-B-TACE and 41.8% in B-TACE (p < 0.001), with no significant differences between groups regarding major adverse events.
conclusionB-TACE is safe and effective, achieving higher CR rates than non-B-TACE. Patients undergoing B-TACE had a significantly lower retreatment rate within the first 6 months but higher PES rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: Level 3, retrospective study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.