Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33709267›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2021

Augmented compression in exchange nailing for femoral and tibial non-unions accelerates time to radiographic union.

Simon Weil, Andreas Fontalis, Myriam Guessoum, Alex Trompeter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fracture nonunion: classification, evaluation and management strategies-a structured approach for higher orthopaedic examinations.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Orthopaedic education: a COVID-driven evolution.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simon WeilDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw road, London, SW17 0QT, UK. simon.weil@doctors.net.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6661-8669
Andreas FontalisDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw road, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Myriam GuessoumDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw road, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Alex TrompeterDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw road, London, SW17 0QT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExchange nailing is widely used for the management of aseptic femoral and tibial non-union. Compressive forces markedly reduce strain, increasing rate and incidence of union. Additional compressive forces can be applied to the non-union site by using the design features of some modern nailing systems. This study hypothesises that the use of additional compression in exchange nailing results in faster time to union.

methodsAll femoral and tibial shaft non-unions were identified over a 4-year period between 2014-2018. Intraoperative compression during exchange nailing was either applied or not applied with a dedicated active compression device through the intramedullary nail. An initial 'radiographic union score for tibia' (RUST) score was calculated from preoperative lateral and AP radiographs and compared with the postoperative radiographs at 6-8 weeks. Healing was defined as bridging callus on at least three cortices (RUST > 10).

resultsA total of 119 patients were identified. Following application of exclusion criteria, we analysed data for 19 patients, 10 undergoing exchange nailing with intraoperative compression and 9 without. The pre-exchange RUST score was comparable between the compressed group and standard exchange group with mean of 7.11 versus 7.5 (p = 0.636). At 6-8 weeks post-op, there was a significant difference between the median RUST score in the compressed group vs standard exchange group, 11 compared to 8.39 (p = 0.001).

conclusionsOur study shows that time to union was accelerated when additional compression was applied to exchange nailing, resulting in reduced follow-up visits and number of radiographs required.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryFractures, UnunitedTibial FracturesBone NailsFracture HealingHumansTibiaTreatment OutcomeAugmented compressionExchange nailingFemoral non-unionReamed intramedullary nailingTibial non-union

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.