ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2021
Electromechanical delay of the hamstrings following semitendinosus tendon autografts in return to competition athletes.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Semitendinosus muscle morphology in relation to surface electrode placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed and contralateral legs.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeKnee flexor electromechanical delay (EMD) has been proposed as a contributing factor to non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk and the semitendinosus (ST) autograft technique has been shown to impair knee flexor torque at large angles of knee flexion. The purpose of this study was to analyse the effects of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using the ST tendon autograft technique on knee flexor EMD across the knee flexion range of motion, in athletes who had returned to competition.
methodsAthletes with ACLR (n = 8 females, n = 3 males, 1.7 ± 0.5 years post-surgery) and non-injured control athletes (n = 6 females, n = 4 males) performed rapid maximal voluntary contractions of isometric knee flexion and extension at 30°, 50°, 70°, 90°,and 105° of knee flexion. Electrical activity of the ST, biceps femoris (BF), vastus lateralis, and vastus medialis was recorded using surface electromyography.
resultsNo change in EMD for the knee flexors or extensors was observed across joint angles. Greater EMD was found only for the BF in the ACLR limb of injured athletes compared to the contralateral limb (P < 0.05). In post-hoc analysis, evidence of ST tendon regrowth was noted for only 2/11 athletes.
conclusionWhile the EMD-joint angle relationship appeared to be unaffected by ST tendon harvest for ACLR, the absence of ST tendon regrowth should be considered. Despite return to competition, greater BF EMD was found, which may impair knee joint stabilization capacity by delaying the transfer time of muscle tension to the tibia after ST autograft.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.