Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33709110›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2021

Twin Peaks: more twinning in humans than ever before.

Christiaan Monden, Gilles Pison, Jeroen Smits

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07408973 (Twin Pregnancy Cohort at Montpellier University Hospital for a Study of the Impact of the Exposome), which is not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
51.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07408973 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Twin Pregnancy Cohort at Montpellier University Hospital for a Study of the Impact of the Exposome: Pilot Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2026 to 2030Enrolled360ConditionsPregnancy, TwinArmsBiological samples from the mother, Biological samples from the twins
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. New insights into the (epi)genetics of twinning.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Clinical Risk Factors Associated With Late-Onset Invasive Group B Streptococcal Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Anthropometric differences between twins at birth and their association with later cognitive performance.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Twin Birth Weight Chart Comparisons in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Christiaan MondenUniversity of Oxford, OX1 2JD Oxford, UK.
Gilles PisonFrench Institute for Demographic Studies (INED), 75980 Paris, France.
Jeroen SmitsGlobal Data Lab, Institute for Management Research, Radboud University, 6525 XZ Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle · FRRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionHow many twins are born in human populations and how has this changed over recent decades? SUMMARY ANSWER: Since the 1980s, the global twinning rate has increased by a third, from 9.1 to 12.0 twin deliveries per 1000 deliveries, to about 1.6 million twin pairs each year. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It was already known that in the 1980s natural twinning rates were low in (East) Asia and South America, at an intermediate level in Europe and North America, and high in many African countries. It was also known that in recent decades, twinning rates have been increasing in the wealthier parts of our world as a result of the rise in medically assisted reproduction (MAR) and delayed childbearing. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We have brought together all information on national twinning rates available from statistical offices, demographic research institutes, individual survey data and the medical literature for the 1980-1985 and the 2010-2015 periods. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsFor 165 countries, covering over 99% of the global population, we were able to collect or estimate twinning rates for the 2010-2015 period. For 112 countries, we were also able to obtain twinning rates for 1980-1985. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Substantial increases in twinning rates were observed in many countries in Europe, North America and Asia. For 74 out of 112 countries the increase was more than 10%. Africa is still the continent with highest twinning rates, but Europe, North America and Oceania are catching up rapidly. Asia and Africa are currently home to 80% of all twin deliveries in the world. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: For some countries, data were derived from reports and papers based on hospital registrations which are less representative for the country as a whole than data based on public administrations and national surveys. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe absolute and relative number of twins for the world as a whole is peaking at an unprecedented level. An important reason for this is the tremendous increase in medically assisted reproduction in recent decades. This is highly relevant, as twin deliveries are associated with higher infant and child mortality rates and increased complications for mother and child during pregnancy and during and after delivery. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The contribution of CM was partially supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant No 681546, FAMSIZEMATTERS), Nuffield College, and the Leverhulme Trust. The contribution of GP was partially supported by the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant No ANR-18-CE36-0007-07). The authors declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

Reproductive Techniques, AssistedAfricaChildEuropeFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy RateRegistriesassisted reproductionchanges over timemultiple pregnancytwinningworld

Identifiers

PMID33709110
PMCPMC8129593
OpenAlexW3135363943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.