Massard Prairie Restoration and Soil Microbiome Succession.

J M Shaver, E S Bellis, C Iwaki, J Qualls, J Randolph, J Smith

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J M ShaverDepartment of Biology, University of Arkansas Fort Smith, Fort Smith, AR 72904.

E S BellisDepartment of Computer Science, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR 72467.

C IwakiDepartment of Mathematics, University of Arkansas Fort Smith, Fort Smith, AR 72904.

J QuallsDepartment of Computer Science, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR 72467.

J RandolphBen Geren Golf Course, Sebastian County, Fort Smith, AR 72903.

J SmithDepartment of Biology, University of Arkansas Fort Smith, Fort Smith, AR 72904.

Funding

Understanding Hesitant AdoptersP20GM103429 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Lawrence E Cornett, JERRY WARE · 2012 to 2026

$60.9M

NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103429

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have initially sequenced soil microbial DNA from 4 restored and 3 virgin tallgrass prairie soil samples from Ben Geren Park and Massard Prairie (Fort Smith, AR), respectively. As expected, the soil microbiomes are distinct, with several lineages of nitrogen-fixing bacteria more common in virgin tallgrass prairie. However, we predict that as restoration of tallgrass prairie in Ben Geren Park progresses, the soil microbiome of restored prairie will more closely mirror those of the virgin prairie.

Identifiers

PMID33709089

PMCPMC7946111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.