ArticleJAMIA open2021
Use of machine learning to predict clinical decision support compliance, reduce alert burden, and evaluate duplicate laboratory test ordering alerts.
Article in JAMIA open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Can Clinicians Decide if AI-Enabled Risk Prediction Models Are Fit for Purpose for Real World Use?Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in chronic kidney disease: Early detection, risk prediction, and personalized treatment strategies.World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- Predicting Laboratory Test Ordering in Emergency Departments Using Integrated Structured and Unstructured Electronic Health Records: Machine Learning Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Laboratory risk management for INR alert values.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A mixed methods evaluation of an antimicrobial prescribing clinical decision support system app.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025Article
- Large Language Model-Based Assessment of Clinical Reasoning Documentation in the Electronic Health Record Across Two Institutions: Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Facilitators and barriers to AI adoption in nursing practice: a qualitative study of registered nurses' perspectives.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Clinical Decision Support Systems and Care Delivery.Journal of medical systems · 2024Review
- Real-World Biomarker Test Ordering Practices in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Interphysician Variation and Association With Clinical Outcomes.JCO precision oncology · 2024Article
- Does using artificial intelligence assistance accelerate skill decay and hinder skill development without performers' awareness?Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2024Review
- Building the Model.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2023Review
- The use of artificial intelligence for delivery of essential health services across WHO regions: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Alerts in Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS): A Bibliometric Review and Content Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Laboratory Demand Management Strategies-An Overview.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWhile well-designed clinical decision support (CDS) alerts can improve patient care, utilization management, and population health, excessive alerting may be counterproductive, leading to clinician burden and alert fatigue. We sought to develop machine learning models to predict whether a clinician will accept the advice provided by a CDS alert. Such models could reduce alert burden by targeting CDS alerts to specific cases where they are most likely to be effective. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe focused on a set of laboratory test ordering alerts, deployed at 8 hospitals within the Partners Healthcare System. The alerts notified clinicians of duplicate laboratory test orders and advised discontinuation. We captured key attributes surrounding 60 399 alert firings, including clinician and patient variables, and whether the clinician complied with the alert. Using these data, we developed logistic regression models to predict alert compliance.
resultsWe identified key factors that predicted alert compliance; for example, clinicians were less likely to comply with duplicate test alerts triggered in patients with a prior abnormal result for the test or in the context of a nonvisit-based encounter (eg, phone call). Likewise, differences in practice patterns between clinicians appeared to impact alert compliance. Our best-performing predictive model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82. Incorporating this model into the alerting logic could have averted more than 1900 alerts at a cost of fewer than 200 additional duplicate tests.
conclusionsDeploying predictive models to target CDS alerts may substantially reduce clinician alert burden while maintaining most or all the CDS benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.