ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021
Real-world experience with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Resectable Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma: A National Cohort Analysis.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Emerging immunotherapy and tumor microenvironment for advanced sarcoma: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiency as a Biomarker in Sarcoma.Surgical oncology insight · 2024Article
- Undifferentiated high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma of the common bile duct: A case report and review of literature.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- High-Grade Pleomorphic Sarcomas Treated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience.Cancers · 2024Article
- Advances in treatment of alveolar soft part sarcoma: an updated review.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2023Review
- The proteomic landscape of soft tissue sarcomas.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Current Landscape of Immunotherapy for Advanced Sarcoma.Cancers · 2023Review
- Integration analysis based on fatty acid metabolism robustly predicts prognosis, dissecting immunity microenvironment and aiding immunotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Alveolar soft part sarcoma: progress toward improvement in survival? A population-based study.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Soft Tissue Leiomyosarcoma With Microsatellite Instability, High Tumor Mutational Burden, and Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression Showing Pathologic Complete Response to Pembrolizumab: A Case Report.JCO precision oncology · 2022Article
- Exploring the landscape of immunotherapy approaches in sarcomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Chemotherapy Combined With Recombinant Human Endostatin (Endostar) Significantly Improves the Progression-Free Survival of Stage IV Soft Tissue Sarcomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Pembrolizumab plus Pharmacologic Ascorbate in the Treatment of Leiomyosarcoma.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe goal of this study was to retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in the real-world treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS).
methodsWe analyzed 38 patients who suffered from STS and received pembrolizumab treatment from July 2017 to December 2018 in our hospital. We investigated the influence of clinical characteristics, treatment timing, and treatment protocol on objective response rate (ORR). We also investigated the factors affecting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as the occurrence of severe adverse events (SAEs).
resultsThe overall ORR was 19.4% (7/36). The ORRs of patients who received pembrolizumab treatment as first-line, second-line, and third-line therapy were 42.9% (3/7), 25.0% (4/16), and 0% (0/13), respectively, which showed marginal significance (P=0.052). Four patients (11.1%) maintained a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) for at least 6 months with pembrolizumab monotherapy, or after withdrawal of chemotherapy or targeted therapy regimens. The median PFS was 2.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-3.4 months] and the median OS was 12.0 months (95% CI: 10.2-13.8 months). Cox regression analysis showed that treatment time was an independent factor affecting PFS (P=0.041), while Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) score was the only independent factor affecting OS (P=0.028).
conclusionsIn the real world, the effectiveness of pembrolizumab in the treatment of STS was low. Some subtypes showed a limited response to pembrolizumab, including alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), exoskeletal chondrosarcoma (ESCS), and angiosarcoma (AS), while the response in leiomyosarcoma (LMS) was low. Combination therapy may increase the risk of SAEs, especially when combined with pazopanib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.