Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33708966›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Real-world experience with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

Jiayong Liu, Zhengfu Fan, Chujie Bai, Shu Li, Ruifeng Xue, Tian Gao, Lu Zhang, Zhichao Tan, Zhiwei Fang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiayong LiuDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Zhengfu FanDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Chujie BaiDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Shu LiDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Ruifeng XueDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Tian GaoDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Lu ZhangDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Zhichao TanDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Zhiwei FangDepartment of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing, China.
Peking University Cancer Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe goal of this study was to retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in the real-world treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

methodsWe analyzed 38 patients who suffered from STS and received pembrolizumab treatment from July 2017 to December 2018 in our hospital. We investigated the influence of clinical characteristics, treatment timing, and treatment protocol on objective response rate (ORR). We also investigated the factors affecting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as the occurrence of severe adverse events (SAEs).

resultsThe overall ORR was 19.4% (7/36). The ORRs of patients who received pembrolizumab treatment as first-line, second-line, and third-line therapy were 42.9% (3/7), 25.0% (4/16), and 0% (0/13), respectively, which showed marginal significance (P=0.052). Four patients (11.1%) maintained a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) for at least 6 months with pembrolizumab monotherapy, or after withdrawal of chemotherapy or targeted therapy regimens. The median PFS was 2.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-3.4 months] and the median OS was 12.0 months (95% CI: 10.2-13.8 months). Cox regression analysis showed that treatment time was an independent factor affecting PFS (P=0.041), while Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) score was the only independent factor affecting OS (P=0.028).

conclusionsIn the real world, the effectiveness of pembrolizumab in the treatment of STS was low. Some subtypes showed a limited response to pembrolizumab, including alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), exoskeletal chondrosarcoma (ESCS), and angiosarcoma (AS), while the response in leiomyosarcoma (LMS) was low. Combination therapy may increase the risk of SAEs, especially when combined with pazopanib.

Indexed as

chemotherapyimmunotherapypembrolizumabreal worldSoft tissue sarcoma (STS)target therapy

Identifiers

PMID33708966
PMCPMC7944271
OpenAlexW3134234408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.