Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33708927›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2021

Comparison of three lymph node staging methods for predicting outcome in breast cancer patients with mastectomy.

Meng-Shen Wang, Mo-Zhi Wang, Zhenning Wang, Yongxi Song, Peng Gao, Pengliang Wang, Chong Wang, Xueting Yu, Fengheng Wei, Jingyi Guo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Meng-Shen WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Mo-Zhi WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Zhenning WangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yongxi SongDepartment of Surgical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Peng GaoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Pengliang WangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Chong WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xueting YuDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Fengheng WeiDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Jingyi GuoDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yingying XuDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAxillary lymph node (ALN) staging is essential in predicting the clinical outcome of breast cancer (BC) patients. Traditionally, it follows the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, but its accuracy needs further improvement.

methodsA total of 9,616 BC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 675 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University underwent mastectomy together with ALN dissection were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were conducted to find the most meaningful factors relevant to prognosis.

resultsAfter univariate and multivariate analyses, age, race, primary site, radiation, chemotherapy, grade, T-stage, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), total number of positive lymph nodes (pN), positive lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive LNs (LODDS) were found to be significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Using these non-LN risk factors, we further compared the efficacy of three different ALN staging methods in prognosis via nomograms. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) were used to measure nomogram performance of the ALN staging methods: pN: C-index=0.687 (95% CI: 0.678-0.696), AIC =61,398.24; LNR: C-index =0.691 (95% CI: 0.683-0.701), AIC =61,313.56; and LODDS: C-index =0.691 (95% CI: 0.682-0.700), AIC =61,315.60. We found that the nomogram incorporating LODDS had better predictive ability compared with other two methods. Furthermore, an external validation revealed a C-index of 0.753 (95% CI: 0.690-0.816) for the Asian population, which indicates the nomogram based on LODDS may have universality for both Western and Asian populations.

conclusionsCompared with pN and LNR, LODDS showed higher homeostasis in LN evaluation, and showed marked efficacy in evaluating survival differences among patients with negative LN staging. We constructed a BC prognosis model by incorporating highly relevant clinical pathological factors and a new method of LN staging, which may greatly aid in guiding postoperative treatment.

Indexed as

Breast cancer (BC)log odds of positive LNs (LODDS)lymph node stagingnomograms

Identifiers

PMID33708927
PMCPMC7944312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.