ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2021
Closed-Loop Control for Fluid Resuscitation: Recent Advances and Future Challenges.
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond antimicrobials: a host-directed precision pharmacotherapy framework for septic shock.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- In Vivo Evaluation of Two Hemorrhagic Shock Resuscitation Controllers with Non-Invasive, Intermittent Sensors.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Neural network-enabled, all-electronic control of non-Newtonian fluid flow.Applied physics letters · 2024Article
- AI algorithm for personalized resource allocation and treatment of hemorrhage casualties.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- A Lumped-Parameter Model of the Cardiovascular System Response for Evaluating Automated Fluid Resuscitation Systems.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2024Article
- Hardware-in-Loop Comparison of Physiological Closed-Loop Controllers for the Autonomous Management of Hypotension.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Closed-Loop Controlled Fluid Administration Systems: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- [Controlling excessive fluid resuscitation in massive burn patients to prevent complications].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2022Article
- Supervisory Algorithm for Autonomous Hemodynamic Management Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluid therapy is extensively used to treat traumatized patients as well as patients during surgery. The fluid therapy process is complex due to interpatient variability in response to therapy as well as other complicating factors such as comorbidities and general anesthesia. These complexities can result in under- or over-resuscitation. Given the complexity of the fluid management process as well as the increased capabilities in hemodynamic monitoring, closed-loop fluid management can reduce the workload of the overworked clinician while ensuring specific constraints on hemodynamic endpoints are met with higher accuracy. The goal of this paper is to provide an overview of closed-loop control systems for fluid management and highlight several key steps in transitioning such a technology from bench to the bedside.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.