Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33708753›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2021

Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Antibiotics in Pediatric Patients: A Narrative Review.

Alan Abdulla, Elma E Edwina, Robert B Flint, Karel Allegaert, Enno D Wildschut, Birgit C P Koch, Matthijs de Hoog

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06585358 (DoseTB-individualised Dosing by Model-informed Precision Dosing for Pulmonary Tuberculosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06585358 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

DoseTB-individualised Dosing by Model-informed Precision Dosing for Pulmonary Tuberculosis

TypeobservationalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2025 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsTuberculosis, PulmonaryArmsMIPD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Safe and effective use of vancomycin.Australian prescriber · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Alan AbdullaDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Elma E EdwinaDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Robert B FlintDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Karel AllegaertDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Enno D WildschutDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Birgit C P KochDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Matthijs de HoogDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal pharmacotherapy in pediatric patients with suspected infections requires understanding and integration of relevant data on the antibiotic, bacterial pathogen, and patient characteristics. Because of age-related physiological maturation and non-maturational covariates (e.g., disease state, inflammation, organ failure, co-morbidity, co-medication and extracorporeal systems), antibiotic pharmacokinetics is highly variable in pediatric patients and difficult to predict without using population pharmacokinetics models. The intra- and inter-individual variability can result in under- or overexposure in a significant proportion of patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring typically covers assessment of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and concurrent dose adaptation after initial standard dosing and drug concentration analysis. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) captures drug, disease, and patient characteristics in modeling approaches and can be used to perform Bayesian forecasting and dose optimization. Incorporating MIPD in the electronic patient record system brings pharmacometrics to the bedside of the patient, with the aim of a consisted and optimal drug exposure. In this narrative review, we evaluated studies assessing optimization of antibiotic pharmacotherapy using MIPD in pediatric populations. Four eligible studies involving amikacin and vancomycin were identified from 418 records. Key articles, independent of year of publication, were also selected to highlight important attributes of MIPD. Although very little research has been conducted until this moment, the available data on vancomycin indicate that MIPD is superior compared to conventional dosing strategies with respect to target attainment. The utility of MIPD in pediatrics needs to be further confirmed in frequently used antibiotic classes, particularly aminoglycosides and beta-lactams.

Indexed as

antibioticsBayesianmodel-informed precision dosingneonatespediatricpopulation PK modelstherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID33708753
PMCPMC7940353
OpenAlexW3129921430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.