ArticleGland surgery2021
Resecting a solitary cervical vagal nerve neurofibroma via endoscopic surgery: a case report.
Article in Gland surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vagal neuropathies: An underrecognized potential driver of physical, mental, and immune symptoms.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026Review
- [Rare giant solitary vagus neurofibroma of the neck: a case report and literature review].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurofibromas predominately consist of Schwann cells and fibroblasts, which mainly originate from neurofibromatosis type 1. However, solitary cervical vagal nerve neurofibroma (VNN) has rarely been reported in previously published literature. Additionally, the onset of VNN is characteristically chronic, asymptomatic, and insidious, and is often discovered unexpectedly through physical examination or imaging. The exact etiology and pathogenesis of VNN are yet to be clarified and need further exploration. Consequently, the definitive diagnosis of VNN mainly depends on pathological and immunohistochemical examinations. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells are positive for transcription factor S-100, SRY-related HMG-box (SOX)-10, and vascular marker CD34 will contribute to the diagnosis of VNN. In this uncommon case of left cervical VNN, the patient received comprehensive radiological evaluation before the operation and then underwent mass resection through endoscopic surgery via an axillary and chest wall approach. The patient was satisfied with the postoperative appearance of the neck. Besides, no postoperative complications or recurrence were observed during the consecutive six-month follow-up. Therefore, the successful application of total endoscopic surgery via the bilateral axilla-breast approach (BABA) on this case of neurogenic tumor presents new insights into expanding the operative indications of this technique, which could be a rational candidate for this kind of neck tumor with the requirements of satisfactory aesthetic appearance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.