ArticleGland surgery2021
Quantitative definitions of pain, CA19-9, and tumor size as high-risk features of resectable pancreatic cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Gland surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Contrast-enhanced MRI-based intratumoral heterogeneity assessment for predicting lymph node metastasis in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Risk factors for unresectable pancreatic cancer following high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Focus on Therapeutic Options for Surgically Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Based on Novel Biomarkers.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- The added value of [European radiology · 2023Article
- Survival benefit of local consolidative therapy for patients with single-organ metastatic pancreatic cancer: a propensity score-matched cross-sectional study based on 17 registries.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Regional lymph node metastasis detected on preoperative CT and/or FDG-PET may predict early recurrence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma after curative resection.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Quantitative definitions of prognostic indicators of resectable pancreatic cancer.Gland surgery · 2022Article
- Deep learning radiomics of dual-energy computed tomography for predicting lymph node metastases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Adjusting CA19-9 values with clinical stage and bilirubin to better predict survival of resectable pancreatic cancer patients: 5-year-follow-up of a single center.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of malignant tumors with the worst prognosis. Surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy are the main treatments for resectable pancreatic cancer. For borderline resectable PDAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been advised. For clearly resectable PDAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy also might be considered for the patients with high-risk features, but with no precise quantitative criteria to define these features. So, this study aimed to re-evaluate the relationship between high-risk features and prognosis of clearly resectable pancreatic cancer, and to define the precise criteria for these high-risk features.
methodsData from 211 patients with clearly resectable pancreatic cancer were reviewed to assess the relationship between overall survival (OS) after surgery and high-risk features, and cut-off values were determined for high-risk features that were associated with poor prognosis of clearly resectable pancreatic cancer.
resultsLymph node metastasis (LNM), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and primary tumor size ≥6 cm were significant variables related to OS. CA19-9 ≥1,000 U/mL was statistically related to prognosis, as was CA19-9 ≥500 U/mL without obstructive jaundice. There was no significant relationship between abdominal and/or back pain and OS, but patients with moderate or severe pain accompanied by tumor size ≥4 cm or 10 times higher CA19-9 levels had worse prognosis.
conclusionsFor clearly resectable pancreatic cancer with R0 resection, the high-risk features were clarified. Abdominal and/or back pain may not be used as a prognostic indicator alone, though combined with CA19-9 or tumor size it may be more valuable for predicting prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.