Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33708502›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2021

Mechanical circulatory support systems: evolution, the systems and outlook.

Roland Hetzer, Mariano Francisco Del Maria Javier, Michael Dandel, Matthias Loebe, Eva Maria Javier Delmo

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Roland HetzerDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Cardio Centrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Mariano Francisco Del Maria JavierDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Cardio Centrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Michael DandelDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Cardio Centrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias LoebeThoracic Transplant and Mechanical Support, Miami Transplant Institute, Memorial Jackson Health System, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Eva Maria Javier DelmoCharité Research Organization, Universitätsmedizin Berlin-Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The joint efforts in the fields of surgery, medicine and biomedical engineering, sponsored by both the government and the industry, have led to the development of mechanical support devices that can provide reliable circulatory support, which can temporarily support a patient's circulation until either the heart recovers or until a new heart can be transplanted or permanently replace a failed heart. Their development has been driven by the shortage of donor organs. Various systems have eventually evolved for short or long-term support of patients suffering from cardiogenic and/or advanced heart failure (HF). Over time, several have been withdrawn from the market due to high rate of thromboembolism and pump-related complications, but many others remained with modern principles of circulatory support proved to be durable and reliable. Hopefully, the ever-evolving technology will yield several devices aimed at their miniaturization, with an energy supply without risk of infection, a system which is simple to implant and to exchange, minimalization of thrombus formation by optimal interior pump design, new antithrombotic medications and a system with demand-based pump activity. It is important to remember that such devices are only implanted to keep a patient alive or in an immediate life-threatening stage. In such circumstances, attribution of aforementioned difficulties to pump limitations or to advanced disease states remains difficult. In the coming years, ventricular assist devices (VADs) could be the most common surgical preference for treating severe HF.

Indexed as

Continuous flow ventricular assist device (continuous flow VAD)extracorporeal ventricular assist device (extracorporeal VAD)pulsatile pumpsthromboembolismtotal artificial heart (TAH)

Identifiers

PMID33708502
PMCPMC7944216
OpenAlexW3025448828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.