Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33708494›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2021

Organ-saving surgical alternatives to treatment of heart failure.

Roland Hetzer, Mariano Francisco Del Maria Javier, Frank Wagner, Matthias Loebe, Eva Maria Javier Delmo

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical Impact of Computational Heart Valve Models.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  3. A Brief History of Cardiomyoplasty: Worth Another Look?Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Roland HetzerDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Cardio Centrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Mariano Francisco Del Maria JavierDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Cardio Centrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Frank WagnerCharité Research Organization, Universitätsmedizin Berlin-Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias LoebeThoracic Transplant and Mechanical Support, Miami Transplant Institute, Memorial Jackson Health System, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Eva Maria Javier DelmoCharité Research Organization, Universitätsmedizin Berlin-Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over time, various surgical treatment strategies have evolved to manage advanced heart failure (HF). Scientific and technological breakthroughs through the last 50 years have put forward various surgical alternatives to patients with advanced HF encompassing surgical ventricular restoration to surgical gene therapy and stem cell replacement of the diseased ventricles. Organ-saving surgical options which used to be promising included dynamic cardiomyoplasty, partial resection of ventricle and cardiac wrapping with Acorn CorCap cardiac support device. These procedures were eventually abandoned due to negative outcomes and without proven disadvantages. Another organ-saving surgical option currently being considered but still make little sense is cardiac regeneration by stem cell therapy, i.e., cardiomyocyte restoration and replacement. Presently, the organ-saving surgical alternatives to treat end-stage HF are revascularization for ischemic cardiomyopathy, mitral valve surgery (repair or replacement) for ischemic mitral incompetence (IMI), left ventricular (LV) aneurysmectomy (surgical ventricular restoration) and mitral valve repair for IMI. These aforementioned procedures have become quite established approaches and with increasing experience are continuously being modified to improve outcome. Various mechanical circulatory support systems have emerged over time to improve functional status of patients with advanced HF, either as a bridge to heart transplantation or as a bridge to myocardial recovery. Likewise offered in those with contraindications to transplantation. Ventricular assist devices (VAD) can keep patients alive until an eventual transplantation. This article reviews the variety of the myriad of alternative organ-saving surgical alternatives that have been available or are currently available provided to patients with end-stage HF, their advantages and deficiencies, as well as prospects in HF therapy.

Indexed as

Aneurysmectomycardiomyoplastycoronary revascularizationheart failure (HF)heart transplantationischemic cardiomyopathyischemic mitral incompetence (IMI)partial left ventriculectomystem cell therapyventricular assist devices (VAD)

Identifiers

PMID33708494
PMCPMC7944209
OpenAlexW3045275488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.