ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2021
Evolution of heart transplantation since Barnard's first.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simultaneous Heart and Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Proportional Meta-Analysis of Its Characteristics and Long-Term Variables.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024Pooled it
- Heart Transplant: A Never-Ending Story.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Insights into the history and tendency of cardiac transplantation for heart failure: A bibliometric-based visual analysis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- A Pioneer of Cardiothoracic Surgery - the Brazilian Northeast Heart Transplant Program.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2025Review
- Longitudinal assessment of bone mineral density changes after heart transplant: Implications for DXA screening frequency.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025Article
- Donation after circulatory death improves probability of heart transplantation in waitlisted candidates and results in post-transplant outcomes similar to those achieved with brain-dead donors.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Article
- Review
- Assessment of the Desire and Readiness of Taif Residents for Heart Donation After Death.Cureus · 2023Article
- The history of cardiac xenotransplantation: early attempts, major advances, and current progress.Frontiers in transplantation · 2023Review
- Heart graft preservation technics and limits: an update and perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Donation After Circulatory Death: A New Frontier.Current cardiology reports · 2022Review
- Heart Donation and Preservation: Historical Perspectives, Current Technologies, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Barnard's first human heart transplantation in 1967 has paved the channel to numerous extensive researches and clinical experiences, mostly from the Stanford group, on orchestrating criteria for donor and recipient selection, immunosuppression, distant heart procurement, re-transplantation, and further global performance of the procedure until it became the gold standard therapy for end-stage heart failure, even in the face of an utterly limited organ availability. Much has happened since Barnard's first. There has been a rapid rise to 4,000-5,000 transplants per year. Previously, the number of transplants depended on the capacity of the units. Later on, it depended largely on the availability of donor organs. The widening of indications and reduction of contraindications to heart transplantations to include elderly patients >70 years, systemic diseases such as amyloidosis, has emerged. Indeed, heart transplantation has come a long way, and is considered a fruitful and stimulating episode in modern medicine. It is rather deplorable to watch that in the beginning of 1990s, the yearly number of heart transplantations began to decline-not because the operation had proved unsuccessful, but because donor hearts became scarce. It is rather poignant that although science and technology as well as increased experience accumulated over a long time have paved the way to make such an operation possible, its applicability is limited by lack of public awareness or its unwillingness to agree to organ donation. The average transplant survival is now over 10 years. Its prevalence and success, however, belies the fact that over 52 years ago, no one had ever attempted the procedure in man and that the procedure seemed destined for ignominy and failure just a year after the first transplant. Had it not been for the work of a few scientists and physicians, each who stepped on the broad shoulders of those who had come previously, the history of heart transplantation would be nothing more than a few legends and myths in dusty tomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.