Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33708490›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2021

Evolution of heart transplantation since Barnard's first.

Mariano Francisco Del Maria Javier, Eva Maria Javier Delmo, Roland Hetzer

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Simultaneous Heart and Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Proportional Meta-Analysis of Its Characteristics and Long-Term Variables.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Heart Transplant: A Never-Ending Story.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Longitudinal assessment of bone mineral density changes after heart transplant: Implications for DXA screening frequency.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical transplantation and research · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Donation After Circulatory Death: A New Frontier.Current cardiology reports · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariano Francisco Del Maria JavierCardio Centrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Eva Maria Javier DelmoUniversitätsmedizin Berlin-Charité, Charité Research Organisation, Berlin, Germany.
Roland HetzerCardio Centrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Barnard's first human heart transplantation in 1967 has paved the channel to numerous extensive researches and clinical experiences, mostly from the Stanford group, on orchestrating criteria for donor and recipient selection, immunosuppression, distant heart procurement, re-transplantation, and further global performance of the procedure until it became the gold standard therapy for end-stage heart failure, even in the face of an utterly limited organ availability. Much has happened since Barnard's first. There has been a rapid rise to 4,000-5,000 transplants per year. Previously, the number of transplants depended on the capacity of the units. Later on, it depended largely on the availability of donor organs. The widening of indications and reduction of contraindications to heart transplantations to include elderly patients >70 years, systemic diseases such as amyloidosis, has emerged. Indeed, heart transplantation has come a long way, and is considered a fruitful and stimulating episode in modern medicine. It is rather deplorable to watch that in the beginning of 1990s, the yearly number of heart transplantations began to decline-not because the operation had proved unsuccessful, but because donor hearts became scarce. It is rather poignant that although science and technology as well as increased experience accumulated over a long time have paved the way to make such an operation possible, its applicability is limited by lack of public awareness or its unwillingness to agree to organ donation. The average transplant survival is now over 10 years. Its prevalence and success, however, belies the fact that over 52 years ago, no one had ever attempted the procedure in man and that the procedure seemed destined for ignominy and failure just a year after the first transplant. Had it not been for the work of a few scientists and physicians, each who stepped on the broad shoulders of those who had come previously, the history of heart transplantation would be nothing more than a few legends and myths in dusty tomes.

Indexed as

allograft rejectionbrain deathdistant heart procurementHeart failureheart transplantationimmunosuppressionre-transplantation

Identifiers

PMID33708490
PMCPMC7944212
OpenAlexW3022703404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.