ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2021
A narrative review of low-dose rivaroxaban in patients with atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease: vascular protection beyond anticoagulation.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the Role of Andexanet Alfa in Managing Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients on Vascular-Dose Rivaroxaban: A Clinical Dilemma.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
- Optimal Antithrombotic Regimens Across Atherosclerotic Vascular Beds: Toward Mechanism and Risk-Oriented Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical profile, management and outcomes of patients taking dual pathway inhibition for cardiovascular protection in clinical practice in Latin America. Data from the XATOA registry.Drugs in context · 2026Article
- Current Medical Therapy and Revascularization in Peripheral Artery Disease of the Lower Limbs: Impacts on Subclinical Chronic Inflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Platelets in Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury.Hamostaseologie · 2023Review
- Article
- Effects of Hyperglycemia and Diabetes Mellitus on Coagulation and Hemostasis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major cardiovascular (CV) events often complicate the natural history of apparently stable atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) despite appropriate guideline-based preventive treatment. This finding has been termed residual risk and it has been the focus of recent investigation. New and revisited targets to tackle this so-called residual risk have been proposed, including antithrombotic treatment intensification, further lowering targets of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, novel oral antidiabetic agents with a CV benefit, and drugs to reduce systemic inflammation. In this narrative review, we discuss the evidence, mechanisms and gaps in knowledge concerning the vascular protection derived from low-dose (2.5 mg twice daily) rivaroxaban. On this topic, the main trials (ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51, COMPASS and VOYAGER PAD), will be summarized in a comprehensive manner. Indeed, these have shown that a drug developed to prevent thrombus formation (selective Factor Xa inhibition) reduced events that were traditionally platelet-related in concept. Moreover, we propose a simple evidence-based clinically oriented algorithm to thoroughly identify patients at increased risk and who may benefit from this strategy in different clinical scenarios. Low-dose rivaroxaban portrays a novel promising era in atherothrombotic CVD prevention, providing a mechanistic protection beyond traditional strategies in patients overwhelmed by recurrent dismal events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.