Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33708400›Full record

ArticleIUCrJ2021

Steve P Meisburger, Da Xu, Nozomi Ando

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IUCrJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Temporal ghost imaging for pump-probe X-ray solution scattering.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Scaling and merging macromolecular diffuse scattering with mdx2.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Adaptable SEC-SAXS data collection for higher quality structure analysis in solution.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Journal of applied crystallography · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steve P MeisburgerDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, 259 East Avenue, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Da XuDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, 259 East Avenue, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Nozomi AndoDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, 259 East Avenue, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

Funding

Protein Allostery and Catalysis Beyond Bragg DiffractionR35GM124847 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Nozomi Ando · 2017 to 2026
$4.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixtures of biological macromolecules are inherently difficult to study using structural methods, as increasing complexity presents new challenges for data analysis. Recently, there has been growing interest in studying evolving mixtures using small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) in conjunction with time-resolved, high-throughput or chromatography-coupled setups. Deconvolution and interpretation of the resulting datasets, however, are nontrivial when neither the scattering components nor the way in which they evolve are known

Indexed as

AEX-SAXSdeconvolutionhigh-throughput SAXSligand titrationmultivariate curve resolutionpair-distance distribution functionregularized alternating least squaressingular value decompositionsmall-angle X-ray scatteringtime-resolved SAXS

Identifiers

PMID33708400
PMCPMC7924237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.