Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33708050›Full record

ArticleTransfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie2021

Comparison of Total Immunoglobulin G in Ante- and Postmortem Blood Samples from Tissue Donors.

Gudrun Larscheid, Tino Schulz, Hermann Herbst, Tina Trögel, Sascha Eulert, Axel Pruß, Jan Schroeter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Suitability of Different Diagnostic Platforms for Virological Testing of Blood Samples from Cornea Donors.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Safety Aspects in Tissue Banking - An Update.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gudrun LarscheidDepartment of Pathology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
Tino SchulzUniversity Tissue Bank, Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hermann HerbstDepartment of Pathology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
Tina TrögelDepartment of Pathology, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
Sascha EulertGerman Rheumatism Research Center, a Leibniz Institute, Epidemiology Unit, Berlin, Germany.
Axel PrußUniversity Tissue Bank, Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jan SchroeterUniversity Tissue Bank, Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEVivantes Klinikum · DEGerman Rheumatism Research Centre · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA serology testing for infectious diseases (HIV, hepatitis B and C, syphilis) is mandatory in tissue donors. In many donors postmortem blood is the only sample available. Even though serological tests and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT) used are validated for postmortem blood, a characterization of those blood samples is not yet established. We therefore investigated the total immunoglobulin G (IgG) content in postmortem blood of tissue donors and compared it to a corresponding antemortem blood sample.

methodsAnte- and postmortem blood samples were obtained from 100 consecutive tissue donors. The total IgG of all samples was measured using an immune-turbidometric test on the AU 480 Chemistry Analyzer (Beckman Coulter).

resultsThe mean total IgG concentration of antemortem blood samples from all 100 donors was 8.9 g/L ± 3.7 g/L (median 8.9 g/L, range 1.5 to 23.8 g/L). In 80 donors the IgG concentration in the antemortem blood sample was within the normal range with values ≥6 g/L (mean 10.0 g/L ± 3.3 g/L, median 9.3 g/L,). The total IgG concentration of the postmortem blood samples was lower with 7.2 g/L ± 3.2 g/L (median 6.7 g/L, range 0.6 to 18.2 g/L). The difference between the values of the antemortem and postmortem blood samples was 1.7 g/L ± 2.6 g/L (16.3%) (median 1.6 g/L, range -7.7 to 10.1 g/L). In 36 donors this difference was less than 10%, in 23 it was between 10 and 25%, in 33 between 26 and 50%, and in 8 over 50%. In 57 donors the total IgG in the postmortem blood sample was within the normal range with ≥6 g/L, in 53 of them also the value of the antemortem blood sample was within the normal range. No correlation for total IgG was found regarding the donor characteristics (age, sex, disease) and the sample characteristics (hemolysis, postmortem time).

conclusionTotal IgG values in antemortem samples were below the lower limit of 6 g/L in 20% of the cases. Total IgG was significantly lower in the postmortem samples compared to the antemortem samples, while 57% were still above the lower limit. No correlation with the postmortem time could be found. This lowered IgG levels should be payed attention to when using postmortem blood for infectious serology testing. Additional NAT testing should be considered.

Indexed as

Donor screeningImmunoglobulinPostmortem bloodTissue bankTissue donation

Identifiers

PMID33708050
PMCPMC7923840
OpenAlexW3120171100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.