Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33708039›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health sciences

Possible association of Vitamin D receptor, caudal-related homeobox 2 polymorphism with the risk of cancer.

Madiha Rehman, Tabassum Mahboob, Syed M Shahid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Madiha RehmanDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Karachi, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Tabassum MahboobDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Karachi, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Syed M ShahidSchool of Health Science, Eastern Institute of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was conducted to find out the possible association of Vitamin D receptor, caudal-related homeobox 2 (VDR-Cdx2) polymorphism with cancer in the given study group.

methodsIn this study, 151 subjects (84 cases and 67 controls) were recruited from two local tertiary care hospitals of Karachi, Pakistan, suffering from various cancers including gastric cancer (GC), rectal cancer (RC), colon cancer (CC), and multiple myeloma followed by ethical approval from institutions and informed consent from all the participants. The genotyping of VDR-Cdx2 polymorphism was performed using tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction method. The genotypic assortment/distribution in the control and disease groups was according to Hardy-Weinberg's equilibrium.

resultsThe genotype frequencies of VDR-Cdx2 polymorphism in cancer patients were observed as: AA 1.2%, AG 32%, and GG 66.8% while in control group as; AA 7.5%, AG 50.7%, and GG was 41.8%. The results unveil that the genotype VDR-Cdx2 was found significantly different in cancer and control group (

conclusionThe observed single-nucleotide polymorphism of VDR-Cdx2 gene may be considered as a risk factor for the cancer in this study group. The AG and GG genotypes established an association with various cancers including GC, RC, CC, and multiple myeloma in Pakistani population. Further investigations examining large data are required to compare the role of VDR-Cdx2 polymorphism in cancer etiology in related population.

Indexed as

Cancercaudal-related homeobox 2single-nucleotide polymorphismtetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reactionVitamin D receptor

Identifiers

PMID33708039
PMCPMC7934131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.