ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2020
Role Of Intravenous Iron Over Nonsurgical Transfusions In Major Burns.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anemia is a frequent condition in burn patients due to a mixture of blood loss and chronic inflammation. Transfusions increase the probability of serious infections and reduce overall survival, especially when unrelated to perioperative blood loss. Once the surgical phase in burn patients is completed, the role of parenteral iron administration in the reduction of subsequent transfusions is not well established. Burn patients subjected to at least two surgeries and presenting progressive anemia after concluding the surgical phase, without major symptoms, were selected (n=12). Those patients with confirmed iron deficiency were treated with intravenous (i.v.) ferric carboxymaltose (n=8). Subsequently, these patients were compared with a group of 18 control patients selected from our historical database (n=1375), matching controls by age (±5 years), sex, and TBSA burn (±6%). The objective was to verify if i.v. iron administration reduced the need for blood transfusions after the surgical phase. The analysis concluded that none of the cases treated required transfusions compared to 44% of the controls. There were no side effects related to the i.v. iron infusion. This result suggests that i.v. iron supplementation with ferric carboxymaltose could be an alternative in anemic patients without major symptoms once the surgical phase is completed. Iron deficiency should be assessed and i.v. supplementation must be administered if required in burn patients showing progressive anemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33708019PMC7894841W3133536507What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.