Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33707926›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2021

Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004).

Feng Xu, Chuqi Lei, Heng Cao, Jun Liu, Jie Li, Hongchuan Jiang, Chinese Society Of Breast Surgery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Application of dual chamber round tissue expander in immediate breast reconstruction].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Feng XuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Chuqi LeiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Heng CaoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Jun LiuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Hongchuan JiangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Chinese Society Of Breast SurgeryDepartment of Breast Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMulti-center data on the current status and trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy in China are lacking. Herein, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to investigate the current clinical practice pattern of postmastectomy breast reconstruction among Chinese female patients with breast cancer.

methodsA standardized questionnaire used to collect information on breast reconstruction among females diagnosed with breast cancer was distributed by 31 members of the Chinese Society of Breast Surgery between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018. Information was collected on tumor characteristics, treatment, mesh application, nipple-areola complex (NAC) preservation, postoperative complications, bilateral reconstruction, patient satisfaction and local recurrence. The overall rate of breast reconstruction was assessed, and the characteristics were compared across patient groups with different reconstruction approaches.

resultsA total of 1,554 patients underwent breast reconstruction after total mastectomy, with a reconstruction rate of 9.6%. Among them, 1,190 were implant-based, and 262 underwent autologous reconstructions, while 102 cases underwent a combination of both. Patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction were younger than those who received autologous reconstruction (40.1±4.6

conclusionsImplant-based breast reconstruction remains the dominant choice among patients, while autologous reconstruction was associated with higher aesthetic satisfaction. Our multi-center investigation based on the findings of the tertiary hospitals of Chinese Society of Breast Surgery may guide a future series of clinical studies on breast reconstruction in China.

Indexed as

Breast cancerbreast reconstructionmastectomypatient satisfactionquestionnaire survey

Identifiers

PMID33707926
PMCPMC7941688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.