Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33707843›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2021

A Comparative Study of Bone Marrow Squash and Wedge Aspiration Smears.

Neeti Arora Ahluwalia, Naveen Kakkar, Kanwardeep Singh Kwatra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neeti Arora AhluwaliaDepartment of Pathology, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab 141008 India.
Naveen KakkarPresent Address: Department of Pathology, Maharishi Makandeshwar Medical College & Hospital, Kumarhatti, Solan, Himachal Pradesh 173229 India.ORCID 0000-0001-8820-3934
Kanwardeep Singh KwatraDepartment of Pathology, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab 141008 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow examination entails study of aspirate smears, touch imprints and trephine biopsy. Bone marrow aspirate smears can be prepared by the squash (crush) or wedge method. Both techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages. There is paucity of studies that have compared these smear types. This study was conducted over a period of one year. Two hundred and five bone marrow aspirates were included. Both squash and wedge smears were made. Blinded slide review was done. Bone marrow cellularity, megakaryocyte number, myeloid to erythroid (M:E) ratio, morphology and final diagnosis on each smear type was compared. Chi square test, t-test and Kappa were applied to study the agreement between the wedge and squash smears. Among the 205 patients studied, squash smears showed significant over estimation of cellularity and megakaryocyte number (

Indexed as

AspirationBone marrowCrushSmearsSquashWedge

Identifiers

PMID33707843
PMCPMC7900386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.