Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33707839›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2021

Conditioning Regimens for Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: BEAM Versus High Dose ICE.

Ahmet Kursad Gunes, Simten Dagdas, Funda Ceran, Mehmet Ali Ucar, Mesude Falay, Cenk Sunu, Meltem Ayli, Nurullah Zengin, Gulsum Ozet

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmet Kursad GunesDepartment of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Ankara City Hospital, Universiteler Avenue Bilkent Street. No:1, 06800 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5522-8342
Simten DagdasDepartment of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Ankara City Hospital, University of Health and Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
Funda CeranDepartment of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Ankara City Hospital, Universiteler Avenue Bilkent Street. No:1, 06800 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet Ali UcarFaculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Mesude FalayDepartment of Biochemistry, Duzen Laboratory Group, Ankara, Turkey.
Cenk SunuDepartment of Hematology, Sakarya Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.
Meltem AyliDepartment of Hematology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Nurullah ZenginFaculty of Medicine, Department of Oncology, Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey.
Gulsum OzetDepartment of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Ankara City Hospital, Universiteler Avenue Bilkent Street. No:1, 06800 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
Çankaya University · TRAnkara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRAnkara Yıldırım Beyazıt University · TRCukurova University · TRGülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi · TRSakarya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are different drug combinations and conditioning regimens in lymphoma transplants. However, no randomized data is available to demonstrate the superiority of any regimen and the optimal choice is unknown. In this analysis, we compared the efficacy, toxicity and the survival outcomes of the BEAM and the high dose ICE (hdICE) conditioning regimens in relapsed NHL and relapsed/refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma patients undergoing auto-SCT. 83 patients with relapsed/refractory HL or relapsed NHL who were treated with Auto-SCT between 2006 and 2016, were analyzed retrospectively. 52 patients (62.7%) received BEAM, while 31 patients (37.3%) received hdICE. Between two groups there is no significant difference in age, gender, diagnosis, disease stage, chemosensitivity, ECOG performance status, time from diagnosis to transplant, salvage regimens and previous lines of chemotherapy. After a median of 59-month follow-up, PFS and OS rates of both groups were similar (5-year PFS was 51.6% in BEAM group, 48.8% in hdICE group,

Indexed as

Autologous stem cell transplantationBEAMConditioning regimensHigh dose ICELymphoma

Identifiers

PMID33707839
PMCPMC7900376
OpenAlexW3041437551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.