Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33707835›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2021

Comparison of Bone Marrow Involvement with Bone Marrow Biopsy and PET-CT and Evaluation of Any Effects on Survival in Patients Diagnosed with Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Mesut Göçer, Erdal Kurtoğlu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mesut GöçerDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, 07100 Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0346-7154
Erdal KurtoğluDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, 07100 Antalya, Turkey.
Antalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to demonstrate whether PET-CT can replace bone marrow biopsy in detecting bone marrow involvement in subtypes of lymphoma. In addition, we aimed to also reveal whether there is a difference between the mean survival of patients with bone marrow involvement via PET-CT or biopsy. A total of 276 newly diagnosed lymphoma patients who underwent bone marrow biopsy and PET-CT prior to the treatment were scanned retrospectively. Bone marrow biopsy was used as the standard method to investigate the presence of bone marrow involvement in PET-CT. The relationship between bone marrow involvement and mean survival was compared using both methods. Out of the 276 patients, bone marrow involvement was detected with PET-CT and with biopsy, respectively in 56 patients (20.2%) and in 78 patients (28.2%). In terms of PET-CT's accuracy with respect to revealing bone marrow involvement, the highest rates were achieved respectively in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (87.4%) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (77.7%). In both the PET-CT and bone marrow biopsy methods, Overall Survival (OS) was found to be significantly shorter in patients with involvement than in patients without involvement (

Indexed as

BiopsyBone marrow involvementLymphomaOverall survivalPET–CT

Identifiers

PMID33707835
PMCPMC7900321
OpenAlexW3021952287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.