ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2021
Use of a convolutional neural network to identify infarct core using computed tomography perfusion parameters.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of infarct core and ischemic penumbra using computed tomography perfusion and deep learning.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Agreement between estimated computed tomography perfusion ischemic core and follow-up infarct on diffusion-weighted imaging.Insights into imaging · 2022Article
- Validation of an artificial intelligence-driven large vessel occlusion detection algorithm for acute ischemic stroke patients.The neuroradiology journal · 2021Article
- Investigation of convolutional neural networks using multiple computed tomography perfusion maps to identify infarct core in acute ischemic stroke patients.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeComputed tomography perfusion (CTP) is used to diagnose ischemic strokes through contralateral hemisphere comparisons of various perfusion parameters. Various perfusion parameter thresholds have been utilized to segment infarct tissue due to differences in CTP software and patient baseline hemodynamics. This study utilized a convolutional neural network (CNN) to eliminate the need for non-universal parameter thresholds to segment infarct tissue.
methodsCTP data from 63 ischemic stroke patients was retrospectively collected and perfusion parameter maps were generated using Vitrea CTP software. Infarct ground truth labels were segmented from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and CTP and DWI volumes were registered. A U-net based CNN was trained and tested five separate times using each CTP parameter (cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), time-to-peak (TTP), mean-transit-time (MTT), delay time). 8,352 infarct slices were utilized with a 60:30:10 training:testing:validation split and Monte Carlo cross-validation was conducted using 20 iterations. Infarct volumes were reconstructed following segmentation from each CTP slice. Infarct spatial and volumetric agreement was compared between each CTP parameter and DWI.
resultsSpatial agreement metrics (Dice coefficient, positive predictive value) for each CTP parameter in predicting infarct volumes are: CBF=(0.67, 0.76), CBV=(0.44, 0.62), TTP=(0.60, 0.67), MTT=(0.58, 0.62), delay time=(0.57, 0.60). 95% confidence intervals for volume differences with DWI infarct are: CBF=14.3±11.5 mL, CBV=29.6±21.2 mL, TTP=7.7±15.2 mL, MTT=-10.7±18.6 mL, delay time=-5.7±23.6 mL.
conclusionsCBF is the most accurate CTP parameter in segmenting infarct tissue. Segmentation of infarct using a CNN has the potential to eliminate non-universal CTP contralateral hemisphere comparison thresholds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.