ArticleReumatologia2021
Difference in pain and accuracy of two hyaluronic acid injection techniques for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in overweight patients.
Article in Reumatologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound definition of subacromial chronic "fibro-adhesive" bursitis and its treatment via ultrasound guided hydrodilation: a prospective pilot study.Journal of ultrasound · 2024Article
- Medial or Lateral, That Is the Question: A Retrospective Study to Compare Two Injection Techniques in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Pain with Hyaluronic Acid.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- One-Year, Efficacy and Safety Open Label Study, with a Single Injection of a New Hyaluronan for Knee OA: The SOYA Trial.Journal of pain research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate differences of injection related pain, and the accuracy of the techniques in two groups of overweight patients, performing the anterolateral approach for one group (G1) and the superolateral approach for the second group (G2). MATERIAL AND
methodsIn the study, 126 knee joints from 86 osteoarthritis (OA) patients were evaluated. Inclusion criteria were body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25, absence of effusion and coagulopathy. Pain evaluation during injection was evaluated with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), while accuracy of the procedure was evaluated with ultrasound (US).
resultsThe patients' mean age was 69.9 ±9.01, VAS for G1 group was 1.71 ±1.89, for G2 group was 1.74 ±1.31. Mean BMI was 29.69 ±2.86, for G1 group was 28.29 ±3.29, for G2 group was 30.32 ±2.41. No adverse events (AE) occurred in both studied groups. The accuracy rate of the procedure was 69.1% for G1 (38/55 knees), 95.7% for G2 (68/71 knees). No significant difference was found in VAS pain score between G1 and G2 group (
conclusionsHyaluronic acid injection is safe therapeutic option for knee OA with no significant differences between anterolateral and superolateral approaches in terms of pain in overweight patients. However, higher BMI seems to be a predictor of pain in anterolateral access, and the superolateral approach should be preferred in this group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.