Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33707652›Full record

Trial reportLeukemia2021

Treatment-free remission following frontline nilotinib in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 5-year update of the ENESTfreedom trial.

Jerald P Radich, Andreas Hochhaus, Tamás Masszi, Andrzej Hellmann, Jesper Stentoft, María Teresa Gómez Casares, J Valentín García-Gutiérrez, Eibhlin Conneally, Philipp D le Coutre, Norbert Gattermann and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Leukemia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 15 institutions in 10 countries.

Jerald P RadichClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andreas HochhausAbteilung Hämatologie/Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Tamás MassziSemmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2322-9863
Andrzej HellmannMedical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Jesper StentoftAarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
María Teresa Gómez CasaresHospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
J Valentín García-GutiérrezHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4752-0815
Eibhlin ConneallySt James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Philipp D le CoutreCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Norbert GattermannUniversitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Bruno MartinoAzienda Ospedaliera Bianchi Melacrino Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Susanne SausseleIII. Med. Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0357-5785
Francis J GilesDevelopmental Therapeutics Consortium, Chicago, IL, USA.
David M RossDivision of Haematology, SA Pathology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7171-2935
Paola AimoneNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Sai LiNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Ksenia TitorenkoNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5379-388X
Giuseppe SaglioUniversity of Turin, Orbassano, Italy. giuseppe.saglio@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1046-3514
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHAarhus University Hospital · DKAzienda ospedaliera "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" · ITCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEFred Hutch Cancer Center · USGdańsk Medical University · PLHeidelberg University · DEHospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín · ESInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESJena University Hospital · DEOspedale San Giuseppe · ITSemmelweis University · HUSouth Australia Pathology · AUSt. James's Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ENESTfreedom trial assessed the feasibility of treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) following frontline nilotinib treatment. Results for long-term outcomes after a 5-year follow-up are presented herein. Patients who had received ≥2 years of frontline nilotinib therapy and achieved MR

Indexed as

AdolescentFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveLeukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-PhaseMaleProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomenilotinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID33707652
PMCPMC8102196
OpenAlexW3134817819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.