ArticleScientific reports2021
Global multi-method analysis of interaction parameters for reversibly self-associating macromolecules at high concentrations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrodynamic and thermodynamic analysis of PEGylated human serum albumin.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- An automated interface for sedimentation velocity analysis in SEDFIT.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Comparative Thermodynamics of the Reversible Self-Association of Therapeutic mAbs Reveal Opposing Roles for Linked Proton- and Ion-Binding Events.Pharmaceutical research · 2023Article
- An automated interface for sedimentation velocity analysis in SEDFIT.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The Relationship between Protein-Protein Interactions and Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation for Monoclonal Antibodies.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Competing stress-dependent oligomerization pathways regulate self-assembly of the periplasmic protease-chaperone DegP.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Weak macromolecular interactions assume a dominant role in the behavior of highly concentrated solutions, and are at the center of a variety of fields ranging from colloidal chemistry to cell biology, neurodegenerative diseases, and manufacturing of protein drugs. They are frequently measured in different biophysical techniques in the form of second virial coefficients, and nonideality coefficients of sedimentation and diffusion, which may be related mechanistically to macromolecular distance distributions in solution and interparticle potentials. A problem arises for proteins where reversible self-association often complicates the concentration-dependent behavior, such that grossly inconsistent coefficients are measured in experiments based on different techniques, confounding quantitative conclusions. Here we present a global multi-method analysis that synergistically bridges gaps in resolution and sensitivity of orthogonal techniques. We demonstrate the method with a panel of monoclonal antibodies exhibiting different degrees of self-association. We show how their concentration-dependent behavior, examined by static and dynamic light scattering and sedimentation velocity, can be jointly described in a self-consistent framework that separates nonideality coefficients from self-association properties, and thereby extends the quantitative interpretation of nonideality coefficients to probe dynamics in highly concentrated protein solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.