Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33707570›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Four-decade trends in lymph node status of patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma in northern Italy.

Mario Preti, Lauro Bucchi, Leonardo Micheletti, Silvana Privitera, Monica Corazza, Stefano Cosma, Niccolò Gallio, Alessandro Borghi, Federica Bevilacqua, Chiara Benedetto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Viruses · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mario PretiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Lauro BucchiRomagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute (IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori"), Meldola, Forlì, Italy. lauro.bucchi@irst.emr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6771-8119
Leonardo MichelettiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Silvana PriviteraDepartment of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (AOU) Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.
Monica CorazzaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Stefano CosmaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Niccolò GallioDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Alessandro BorghiDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Federica BevilacquaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Chiara BenedettoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 4-decade (1980-2017) trends in lymph node status of patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) in a province of northern Italy were investigated. Information was collected on lymph node dissection, number of lymph nodes dissected, lymph node involvement, and number of positive lymph nodes from a series of 760 patients admitted to a tertiary referral centre for vulvar disease. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for lymph node involvement, for ≥ 2 positive nodes, and for a lymph node ratio ≥ 20% were estimated from multiple logistic regression models. The adjusted OR for lymph node dissection was greater in the 2000s and 2010s versus the 1980s. The adjusted OR for lymph node involvement was 1.36 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-2.60) in the 1990s, 1.31 (95% CI, 0.72-2.38) in the 2000s and 1.32 (95% CI, 0.73-2.41) in the 2010s versus the 1980s. The adjusted OR for ≥ 2 positive nodes was 1.36 (95% CI, 0.68-2.72), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.44-1.65) and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.34-1.31), respectively. The adjusted OR for lymph node ratio ≥ 20% was 1.45 (95% CI, 0.62-3.43), 1.21 (95% CI, 0.54-2.72) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.35-1.89), respectively. This stagnation indicates the need for a serious rethink of the local model for the care of VSCC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleHumansItalyLikelihood FunctionsLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMiddle AgedPrevalenceTime FactorsVulvar Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33707570
PMCPMC7952703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.