ArticleScientific reports2021
Causal effects in microbiomes using interventional calculus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- STROBE-causal machine learning for the human microbiome: systematic review on methodological innovations and validation frameworks.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- From association to causation: a decision-aware framework for reproducible biomarker discovery and precision intervention design in the human gut microbiome.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Improving DirectLiNGAM for high-dimensional microbiome data: roots screening and eBIC based model selection.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Article
- Longitudinal host-microbiome dynamics of metatranscription identify hallmarks of progression in periodontitis.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Efficient and scalable construction of clinical variable networks for complex diseases with RAMEN.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Beyond Microbial Variability: Disclosing the Functional Redundancy of the Core Gut Microbiota of Farmed Gilthead Sea Bream from a Bayesian Network Perspective.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Characterising functional redundancy in microbiome communities via relative entropy.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Utility of Machine Learning to Characterize Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and Its Clinical Implications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
- Unfolding and de-confounding: biologically meaningful causal inference from longitudinal multi-omic networks using METALICA.mSystems · 2024Article
- Progress on network modeling and analysis of gut microecology: a review.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Review
- Unfolding and De-confounding: Biologically meaningful causal inference from longitudinal multi-omic networks using METALICA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Lower respiratory tract microbiome composition and community interactions in smokers.Access microbiology · 2023Article
- A novel approach for combining the metagenome, metaresistome, metareplicome and causal inference to determine the microbes and their antibiotic resistance gene repertoire that contribute to dysbiosis.Microbial genomics · 2022Article
- Prior exposure to microcystin alters host gut resistome and is associated with dysregulated immune homeostasis in translatable mouse models.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Causal inference in biomedical research allows us to shift the paradigm from investigating associational relationships to causal ones. Inferring causal relationships can help in understanding the inner workings of biological processes. Association patterns can be coincidental and may lead to wrong conclusions about causality in complex systems. Microbiomes are highly complex, diverse, and dynamic environments. Microbes are key players in human health and disease. Hence knowledge of critical causal relationships among the entities in a microbiome, and the impact of internal and external factors on microbial abundance and their interactions are essential for understanding disease mechanisms and making appropriate treatment recommendations. In this paper, we employ causal inference techniques to understand causal relationships between various entities in a microbiome, and to use the resulting causal network to make useful computations. We introduce a novel pipeline for microbiome analysis, which includes adding an outcome or "disease" variable, and then computing the causal network, referred to as a "disease network", with the goal of identifying disease-relevant causal factors from the microbiome. Internventional techniques are then applied to the resulting network, allowing us to compute a measure called the causal effect of one or more microbial taxa on the outcome variable or the condition of interest. Finally, we propose a measure called causal influence that quantifies the total influence exerted by a microbial taxon on the rest of the microiome. Our pipeline is robust, sensitive, different from traditional approaches, and able to predict interventional effects without any controlled experiments. The pipeline can be used to identify potential eubiotic and dysbiotic microbial taxa in a microbiome. We validate our results using synthetic data sets and using results on real data sets that were previously published.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.