Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33707527›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Hyperparameter optimisation and validation of registration algorithms for measuring regional ventricular deformation using retrospective gated computed tomography images.

Orod Razeghi, Mattias Heinrich, Thomas E Fastl, Cesare Corrado, Rashed Karim, Adelaide De Vecchi, Tom Banks, Patrick Donnelly, Jonathan M Behar, Justin Gould and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep learning automates detection of wall motion abnormalitiesFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Optimisation of Left Atrial Feature Tracking Using Retrospective Gated Computed Tomography Images.Functional imaging and modeling of the heart : ... International Workshop, FIMH ..., proceedings. FIMH (Conference) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Orod RazeghiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. orod.razeghi@kcl.ac.uk.
Mattias HeinrichInsitute of Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Thomas E FastlSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Cesare CorradoSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Rashed KarimSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Adelaide De VecchiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Tom BanksDepartment of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Patrick DonnellySouth Eastern Health and Social Care Trust, Dundonald, Belfast, UK.
Jonathan M BeharSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Justin GouldSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Ronak RajaniSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Christopher A RinaldiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Steven NiedererSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/15/91/31812Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent dose reduction techniques have made retrospective computed tomography (CT) scans more applicable and extracting myocardial function from cardiac computed tomography (CCT) images feasible. However, hyperparameters of generic image intensity-based registration techniques, which are used for tracking motion, have not been systematically optimised for this modality. There is limited work on their validation for measuring regional strains from retrospective gated CCT images and open-source software for motion analysis is not widely available. We calculated strain using our open-source platform by applying an image registration warping field to a triangulated mesh of the left ventricular endocardium. We optimised hyperparameters of two registration methods to track the wall motion. Both methods required a single semi-automated segmentation of the left ventricle cavity at end-diastolic phase. The motion was characterised by the circumferential and longitudinal strains, as well as local area change throughout the cardiac cycle from a dataset of 24 patients. The derived motion was validated against manually annotated anatomical landmarks and the calculation of strains were verified using idealised problems. Optimising hyperparameters of registration methods allowed tracking of anatomical measurements with a mean error of 6.63% across frames, landmarks, and patients, comparable to an intra-observer error of 7.98%. Both registration methods differentiated between normal and dyssynchronous contraction patterns based on circumferential strain ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). To test whether a typical 10 temporal frames sampling of retrospective gated CCT datasets affects measuring cardiac mechanics, we compared motion tracking results from 10 and 20 frames datasets and found a maximum error of [Formula: see text]. Our findings show that intensity-based registration techniques with optimal hyperparameters are able to accurately measure regional strains from CCT in a very short amount of time. Furthermore, sufficient sensitivity can be achieved to identify heart failure patients and left ventricle mechanics can be quantified with 10 reconstructed temporal frames. Our open-source platform will support increased use of CCT for quantifying cardiac mechanics.

Identifiers

PMID33707527
PMCPMC7952400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.