Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33707505›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

DBnorm as an R package for the comparison and selection of appropriate statistical methods for batch effect correction in metabolomic studies.

Nasim Bararpour, Federica Gilardi, Cristian Carmeli, Jonathan Sidibe, Julijana Ivanisevic, Tiziana Caputo, Marc Augsburger, Silke Grabherr, Béatrice Desvergne, Nicolas Guex and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nasim BararpourUnit of Forensic Toxicology and Chemistry, CURML, Lausanne University Hospital-Geneva University Hospitals, Lausanne-Geneva, Switzerland.
Federica GilardiUnit of Forensic Toxicology and Chemistry, CURML, Lausanne University Hospital-Geneva University Hospitals, Lausanne-Geneva, Switzerland.
Cristian CarmeliCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jonathan SidibeUnit of Forensic Toxicology and Chemistry, CURML, Lausanne University Hospital-Geneva University Hospitals, Lausanne-Geneva, Switzerland.
Julijana IvanisevicUnit of Metabolomics, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tiziana CaputoCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marc AugsburgerUnit of Forensic Toxicology and Chemistry, CURML, Lausanne University Hospital-Geneva University Hospitals, Lausanne-Geneva, Switzerland.
Silke GrabherrCURML, Lausanne University Hospital-Geneva University Hospitals, Lausanne-Geneva, Switzerland.
Béatrice DesvergneCenter for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicolas GuexBioInformatics Competence Center, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Murielle BochudCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Aurelien ThomasUnit of Forensic Toxicology and Chemistry, CURML, Lausanne University Hospital-Geneva University Hospitals, Lausanne-Geneva, Switzerland. aurelien.thomas@chuv.ch.
University of Lausanne · CHUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a powerful phenotyping technology, metabolomics provides new opportunities in biomarker discovery through metabolome-wide association studies (MWAS) and the identification of metabolites having a regulatory effect in various biological processes. While mass spectrometry-based (MS) metabolomics assays are endowed with high throughput and sensitivity, MWAS are doomed to long-term data acquisition generating an overtime-analytical signal drift that can hinder the uncovering of real biologically relevant changes. We developed "dbnorm", a package in the R environment, which allows for an easy comparison of the model performance of advanced statistical tools commonly used in metabolomics to remove batch effects from large metabolomics datasets. "dbnorm" integrates advanced statistical tools to inspect the dataset structure not only at the macroscopic (sample batches) scale, but also at the microscopic (metabolic features) level. To compare the model performance on data correction, "dbnorm" assigns a score that help users identify the best fitting model for each dataset. In this study, we applied "dbnorm" to two large-scale metabolomics datasets as a proof of concept. We demonstrate that "dbnorm" allows for the accurate selection of the most appropriate statistical tool to efficiently remove the overtime signal drift and to focus on the relevant biological components of complex datasets.

Identifiers

PMID33707505
PMCPMC7952378
OpenAlexW3135662642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.