ReviewGut and liver2022
Systematic Endoscopic Approach for Diagnosing Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.
Review in Gut and liver, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Apparent Endoscopic Decrease in the Size of a Large Ulcerated Gastric Schwannoma AfterDEN open · 2027Article
- Gastric subepithelial lesions located within the trajectory of clasp and sling fibers are associated with increased prevalence and severity of reflux esophagitis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Upfront unroofing of subepithelial lesions using cold snare in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract: a retrospective study from Switzerland.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Endoscopic resection for gastric subepithelial lesions: overtreatment or the next step in optimization?Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Rare co-occurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors and leiomyomas: A case report and review of the literature.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Correlation of ultrasonic characteristics, clinicopathological features, and biological risk classification in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors and construction of a preoperative prediction model: a feasibility study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Dental-floss traction-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection of a gastrointestinal exophytic tumor: A case report.SAGE open medical case reports · 2026Article
- Assessing the utility of three-dimensional imaging for preoperative assessment of gastric subepithelial tumors.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Natural History of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: Long-Term Outcomes and Surveillance Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Approach to Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: From Differential Diagnosis to Histologic Confirmation.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Review
- Diagnosis model for gastric submucosal tumor based on multiple decision trees comprising endoscopic and endoscopic ultrasonography features.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Bridging the Gap in Management of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions: Time for Standardized Care.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Article
- Advancements in Endoscopic Treatment for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.Gut and liver · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnosis of Gastric Mesenchymal Tumors Using Digital Endosonography Image Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Diffuse Jejunal Lipomatosis and Associated Complications.ACG case reports journal · 2023Article
- Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging for Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Advancements in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.Gut and liver · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subepithelial tumors (SETs) are commonly encountered during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, especially during national gastric cancer screening programs in Korea. Although the majority of SETs are benign, endoscopists harbor concerns regarding whether a SET is benign or malignant because the diagnosis cannot be established on the basis of routine endoscopic biopsy findings. The differential diagnosis of SETs is important, beginning with meticulous endoscopic examination, including the evaluation of the location, macroscopic shape, color, surface characteristics, mobility, consistency, and size of the tumors. The yield of endoscopic biopsy increases with the use of the bite-on-bite technique for SETs without the rolling or tenting sign, with large openings, and with erosion or ulceration. In this review, a systematic approach for the diagnosis of gastric SETs during conventional endoscopy is introduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.