Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33707346›Full record

ArticleAging2021

Development of the VISAGE enhanced tool and statistical models for epigenetic age estimation in blood, buccal cells and bones.

Anna Woźniak, Antonia Heidegger, Danuta Piniewska-Róg, Ewelina Pośpiech, Catarina Xavier, Aleksandra Pisarek, Ewa Kartasińska, Michał Boroń, Ana Freire-Aradas, Marta Wojtas and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Forensic genetics in the omics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Anna WoźniakCentral Forensic Laboratory of the Police, Warsaw, Poland.
Antonia HeideggerInstitute of Legal Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Danuta Piniewska-RógDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Ewelina PośpiechMalopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Catarina XavierInstitute of Legal Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Aleksandra PisarekMalopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Ewa KartasińskaCentral Forensic Laboratory of the Police, Warsaw, Poland.
Michał BorońCentral Forensic Laboratory of the Police, Warsaw, Poland.
Ana Freire-AradasForensic Genetics Unit, Institute of Forensic Sciences, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Marta WojtasDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Maria de la PuenteInstitute of Legal Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Harald NiederstätterInstitute of Legal Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Rafał PłoskiDepartment Medical Genetics, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena SpólnickaCentral Forensic Laboratory of the Police, Warsaw, Poland.
Manfred KayserDepartment of Genetic Identification, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Christopher PhillipsForensic Genetics Unit, Institute of Forensic Sciences, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Walther ParsonInstitute of Legal Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Wojciech BranickiCentral Forensic Laboratory of the Police, Warsaw, Poland.
VISAGE Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation is known as a biomarker for age with applications in forensics. Here we describe the VISAGE (VISible Attributes through GEnomics) Consortium's enhanced tool for epigenetic age estimation in somatic tissues. The tool is based on eight DNA methylation markers (44 CpGs), bisulfite multiplex PCR followed by sequencing on the MiSeq FGx platform, and three statistical prediction models for blood, buccal cells and bones. The model for blood is based on six CpGs from

Indexed as

CpG IslandsModels, StatisticalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAmidohydrolasesBlood Chemical AnalysisBone and BonesChildChild, PreschoolCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4DNA MethylationEdar-Associated Death Domain ProteinEpigenesis, GeneticAmidohydrolasesaspartoacylaseCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4EDARADD protein, humanEdar-Associated Death Domain ProteinELOVL2 protein, humanFatty Acid ElongasesKLF14 protein, humanKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsPDE4C protein, humanage prediction in blood and buccal cellsage prediction in bonesbisulfite amplicon MPSDNA methylationepigenetic age prediction tool

Identifiers

PMID33707346
PMCPMC7993733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.