Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33706999›Full record

ReviewHearing research2021

Hearing and speech processing in midlife.

Karen S Helfer, Alexandra Jesse

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Speech modifications in interactive speech: effects of age, sex and noise type.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen S HelferDepartment of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 358 N. Pleasant St., Amherst, MA 01003, USA. Electronic address: helfer@umass.edu.
Alexandra JesseDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 135 Hicks Way, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. Electronic address: ajesse@psych.umass.edu.
University of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

Aging and speech perception in complex listening environmentsR01DC012057 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI HELFER, KAREN S · 2012 to 2021
$3.3M
Electrophysiological Indices of Audiovisual Benefits to Speech Processing in Aging AdultsR03AG059105 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI JESSE, ALEXANDRA · 2018 to 2019
$153k
NIA NIH HHS R03 AG059105NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Middle-aged adults often report a decline in their ability to understand speech in adverse listening situations. However, there has been relatively little research devoted to identifying how early aging affects speech processing, as the majority of investigations into senescent changes in speech understanding compare performance in groups of young and older adults. This paper provides an overview of research on hearing and speech perception in middle-aged adults. Topics covered include both objective and subjective (self-perceived) hearing and speech understanding, listening effort, and audiovisual speech perception. This review ends with justification for future research needed to define the nature, consequences, and remediation of hearing problems in middle-aged adults.

Indexed as

HearingSpeechSpeech PerceptionHumansListening EffortNoiseAgingAudiovisual speechListening effortPresbycusisSpeech perception

Identifiers

PMID33706999
PMCPMC7955108
OpenAlexW3093037229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.