ArticleComparative medicine2021
A 3D-printed Apparatus for Imaging Multiple Rats Simultaneously.
Article in Comparative medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CT (computerized tomography) is a necessary imaging modality for cancer staging and disease monitoring. Rodent models of cancer are commonly studied prior to human clinical trials, but CT in rodents can be difficult due to their small size and constant movement, which necessitates general anesthesia. Because microCT equipment is not always available, clinical CT may be a viable alternative. Limitations of microCT and clinical CT include biosecurity, anesthesia to limit image distortion due to motion, and cost. To address several of these constraints, we created a 3D-printed apparatus that accommodated simultaneous imaging of as many as 9 rats under gas anesthesia. Rats were anesthetized in series and placed in a 3 × 3 arrangement. To assess differences in attenuation between individual chambers and rows or columns in the device, we first imaged a standardized phantom plug as a control. We hypothesized that attenuation of specific rat organs would not be affected regardless of the location or position in the 3D-printed device. Four organs-liver, kidney, femur, and brain-were evaluated in 9 rats. For both the phantom and kidneys, statistically significant, but clinically negligible, effects on attenuation were noted between rows but not between columns. We attribute this finding to the absence of a top layer of the apparatus, which thus created asymmetric attenuation and beam hardening through the device. This apparatus allowed us to successfully image 9 rats simultaneously in a clinical CT machine, with negligible effects on attenuation. Planned improvements in this apparatus include completely enclosed versions for biosecure imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.