Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33706813›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2021

Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus (IDEAL): study protocol of a multi-site implementation trial with observational, case study design : Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus.

Jasvinder A Singh, Larry R Hearld, Allyson G Hall, T Mark Beasley

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03735238 (Implementing the Decision-Aid for Lupus), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03735238 completednot on this map

Implementing the Decision-Aid for Lupus (IDEAL Strategy)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamRan2018 to 2025Enrolled1,895ConditionsSystemic Lupus ErythematosusArmsSMILE Computerized Decision-Aid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jasvinder A SinghMedicine Service, VA Medical Center, 700 19th St S, AL, Birmingham, 35233, USA. Jasvinder.md@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-0006
Larry R HearldUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 805B, 510 20th Street S, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0022, USA.
Allyson G HallUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 805B, 510 20th Street S, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0022, USA.
T Mark BeasleyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Birmingham/Atlanta VA Geriatric Research, Education, & Clinical Center, Department of Veteran's Affairs, 510 20th Street S, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0022, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute SDM-2017C2-8224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide the details of the study protocol for an observational, case study design, implementation trial.

methodsImplementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus (IDEAL) study will put into practice a shared decision-making (SDM) strategy, using an individualized, culturally appropriate computerized decision-aid (DA) for lupus patients in 15 geographically diverse clinics in the USA. The overarching frameworks that guide this implementation study are the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Powell's typology of implementation strategies. All 15 clinics will receive standardized capacity-building activities for lupus DA implementation in the clinic, including education, training, technical assistance, re-training, and incorporation of a clinic champion in the core team of each site. In addition, clinics will also choose among clinic-targeted activities to integrate the DA into existing work processes and/or patient-targeted activities to raise awareness and educate patients about the DA. These activities will be chosen to stimulate participant recruitment and retention activities that support the implementation of the DA at their clinic. In study aim 1, using surveys and semi-structured interviews with clinic personnel in 15 lupus clinics, we will assess stakeholder needs and identify clinic and contextual characteristics that inform the implementation strategy component selection and influence implementation effectiveness. Study aim 2 is to implement and assess the effectiveness of the IDEAL (standardized and tailored) strategy in 15 lupus clinics by examining the changes in our primary outcome of penetration, i.e., the proportion of all eligible patients in the clinic that receive the lupus DA, and secondary outcomes include DA appropriateness, acceptability, success, permanence, and feasibility. Study aim 3 is to identify ways to sustain and disseminate our lupus DA via semi-structured debriefing interviews with key clinic personnel and patients. DISCUSSION: The study will enroll at least 500 patient participants with lupus across all 15 sites and assess the effectiveness in implementing the DA in various clinic settings across the USA.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03735238 . Protocol version number: 15, date 6/8/2020.

Indexed as

Decision-aidImplementationLupusSystematic lupus erythematosusTrial

Identifiers

PMID33706813
PMCPMC7951119
OpenAlexW3135389097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.