ArticleImplementation science : IS2021
A cluster randomized controlled trial comparing Virtual Learning Collaborative and Technical Assistance strategies to implement an early palliative care program for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: a study protocol.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04062552 (Implementing Palliative Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementing Palliative Care: Learning Collaborative vs. Technical Assistance
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A process evaluation of early palliative care implementation in the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Practical design considerations for cluster randomized controlled trials: lessons learned in community oncology research.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2025Article
- Similarities and important distinctions between drug and behavioral intervention development.Discover psychology · 2025Review
- Implementation of Agile in healthcare: methodology for a multisite home hospital accelerator.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Learning Collaboratives: a Strategy for Quality Improvement and Implementation in Behavioral Health.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2023Article
- Design and management considerations for control groups in hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials: Narrative review & case studies.Frontiers in health services · 2023Review
- Optimizing the implementation of a multisite feasibility trial of a mind-body program in acute orthopedic trauma.Translational behavioral medicine · 2022Article
- Feasibility and Application of Cluster Nursing to the Care of Patients with Acute Oncology.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Adapting ENABLE for patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers in Singapore: a qualitative formative evaluation.BMC palliative care · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVirtual Learning Collaboratives (VLC), learning communities focused on a common purpose, are used frequently in healthcare settings to implement best practices. Yet, there is limited research testing the effectiveness of this approach compared to other implementation strategies. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a VLC compared to Technical Assistance (TA) among community oncology practices implementing ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends), an evidence-based, early palliative care telehealth, psycho-educational intervention for patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer and their caregivers.
methodsUsing Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Proctor's Implementation Outcomes Frameworks, this two-arm hybrid type-III cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) will compare two implementation strategies, VLC versus TA, among the 48 National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practice clusters that have not historically provided palliative care to all patients with advanced cancer. Three cohorts of practice clusters will be randomized to the study arms. Each practice cluster will recruit 15-27 patients and a family caregiver to participate in ENABLE. The primary study outcome is ENABLE uptake (patient level), i.e., the proportion of eligible patients who complete the ENABLE program (receive a palliative care assessment and complete the six ENABLE sessions over 12 weeks). The secondary outcome is overall program implementation (practice cluster level), as measured by the General Organizational Index at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Exploratory aims assess patient and caregiver mood and quality of life outcomes at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks. Practice cluster randomization will seek to keep the proportion of rural practices, practice sizes, and minority patients seen within each practice balanced across the two study arms. DISCUSSION: This study will advance the field of implementation science by evaluating VLC effectiveness, a commonly used but understudied, implementation strategy. The study will advance the field of palliative care by building the capacity and infrastructure to implement an early palliative care program in community oncology practices.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov . NCT04062552; Pre-results. Registered: August 20, 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04062552?term=NCT04062552&draw=2&rank=1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.