Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33706744›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Keeping children healthy during and after COVID-19 pandemic: meeting youth physical activity needs.

Andjelka Pavlovic, Laura F DeFina, Breanna L Natale, Shelby E Thiele, Timothy J Walker, Derek W Craig, Georgina R Vint, David Leonard, William L Haskell, Harold W Kohl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andjelka PavlovicThe Cooper Institute, 12330 Preston Road, Dallas, TX, 75230, USA. apavlovic@cooperinst.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4400-5466
Laura F DeFinaThe Cooper Institute, 12330 Preston Road, Dallas, TX, 75230, USA.
Breanna L NataleThe Cooper Institute, 12330 Preston Road, Dallas, TX, 75230, USA.
Shelby E ThieleThe Cooper Institute, 12330 Preston Road, Dallas, TX, 75230, USA.
Timothy J WalkerUniveristy of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
Derek W CraigUniveristy of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
Georgina R VintThe Cooper Institute, 12330 Preston Road, Dallas, TX, 75230, USA.
David LeonardThe Cooper Institute, 12330 Preston Road, Dallas, TX, 75230, USA.
William L HaskellDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Harold W KohlUniveristy of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to: 1) examine the maintenance of Physical Education and physical activity during the distance learning time, 2) determine the resources educators are utilizing to deliver PE curricula, and 3) understand the challenges experienced by educators during distance learning.

methodsA survey was sent to a cohort of school-based fitness assessment software users. Respondents were largely school-based individuals including PE teachers (n = 1789), school (n = 62) and district administrators (n = 64), nurses (n = 3), and "other" (n = 522).

resultsOf 2440 respondents, most were from a city or suburb (69.7%), elementary or middle school (72.3%), and had Title 1 status (60.4%), an indicator of low socioeconomic status. Most campuses were closed during the COVID-19 pandemic (97.8%). Of the schools closed during the pandemic, only 2.8% had no prior PE requirements and that increased to 21% during the pandemic. In schools that remained open during the pandemic, 7.7% had no prior PE requirements and this increased to 60.5%. Importantly, 79% of respondents reported that students were either "significantly less" or "somewhat less" physically active during the closure. For closed schools, the most frequently cited challenges included "student access to online learning", "teacher/student communication" and "teacher remote work arrangements". For open schools, the most commonly reported challenges included "social distancing", "access to gymnasium/equipment", and "concern for personal health and wellbeing".

conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has caused important reductions in PE requirements and time engaged in physical activity. Challenges experienced by teachers were identified for closed and open schools.

Indexed as

ExerciseStudentsAdultChildCOVID-19CurriculumEducation, DistanceHumansPhysical Education and TrainingPuerto RicoSchoolsSchool TeachersSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesPandemicPhysical activityPhysical education

Identifiers

PMID33706744
PMCPMC7948663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.