Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33706419›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2021

Reproducibility of lung nodule radiomic features: Multivariable and univariable investigations that account for interactions between CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters.

Nastaran Emaminejad, Muhammad Wasil Wahi-Anwar, Grace Hyun J Kim, William Hsu, Matthew Brown, Michael McNitt-Gray

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Reproducibility and interpretability in radiomics: a critical assessmentDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Enhancing the prediction ofTranslational lung cancer research · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nastaran EmaminejadDepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Muhammad Wasil Wahi-AnwarDepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Grace Hyun J KimDepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
William HsuDepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Matthew BrownDepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Michael McNitt-GrayDepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA SPORE in Brain CancerP50CA211015 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI David A. Nathanson · 2017 to 2026
$25.2M
Research Training in Biomedical PhysicsT32EB002101 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Michael F McNitt-Gray · 2003 to 2026
$5.3M
Quantitative CT Imaging for Response Assessment when using Dose Reduction MethodsU01CA181156 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BROWN, MATTHEW S, GOLDIN, JONATHAN G · 2014 to 2016
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA211015NCI NIH HHS U01 CA181156NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB002101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecent studies have demonstrated a lack of reproducibility of radiomic features in response to variations in CT parameters. In addition, reproducibility of radiomic features has not been well established in clinical datasets. We aimed to investigate the effects of a wide range of CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters on radiomic features in a realistic setting using clinical low dose lung cancer screening cases. We performed univariable and multivariable explorations to consider the effects of individual parameters and the simultaneous interactions between three different acquisition/reconstruction parameters of radiation dose level, reconstructed slice thickness, and kernel.

methodA cohort of 89 lung cancer screening patients were collected that each had a solid lung nodule >4mm diameter. A computational pipeline was used to perform a simulation of dose reduction of the raw projection data, collected from patient scans. This was followed by reconstruction of raw data with weighted filter back projection (wFBP) algorithm and automatic lung nodule detection and segmentation using a computer-aided detection tool. For each patient, 36 different image datasets were created corresponding to dose levels of 100%, 50%, 25%, and 10% of the original dose level, three slice thicknesses of 0.6 mm, 1 mm, and 2 mm, as well as three reconstruction kernels of smooth, medium, and sharp. For each nodule, 226 well-known radiomic features were calculated at each image condition. The reproducibility of radiomic features was first evaluated by measuring the intercondition agreement of the feature values among the 36 image conditions. Then in a series of univariable analyses, the impact of individual CT parameters was assessed by selecting subsets of conditions with one varying and two constant CT parameters. In each subset, intraparameter agreements were assessed. Overall concordance correlation coefficient (OCCC) served as the measure of agreement. An OCCC ≥ 0.9 implied strong agreement and reproducibility of radiomic features in intercondition or intraparameter comparisons. Furthermore, the interaction of CT parameters in impacting radiomic feature values was investigated via ANOVA.

resultsAll included radiomic features lacked intercondition reproducibility (OCCC < 0.9) among all the 36 conditions. Out of 226 radiomic features analyzed, only 17 and 18 features were considered reproducible (OCCC ≥ 0.9) to dose and kernel variation, respectively, within the corresponding condition subsets. Slice thickness demonstrated the largest impact on radiomic feature values where only one to five features were reproducible at a few condition subsets. ANOVA revealed significant interactions (P < 0.05) between CT parameters affecting the variability of >50% of radiomic features.

conclusionWe systematically explored the multidimensional space of CT parameters in affecting lung nodule radiomic features. Univariable and multivariable analyses of this study not only showed the lack of reproducibility of the majority of radiomic features but also revealed existing interactions among CT parameters, meaning that the effect of individual CT parameters on radiomic features can be conditional upon other CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Our findings advise on careful radiomic feature selection and attention to the inclusion criteria for CT image acquisition protocols within the datasets of radiomic studies.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansLungReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedbiomarkersCT acquisition and reconstruction conditionslung nodulesmultivariable analysisquantitative imaging/analysisradiomicsreproducibilityunivariable analysis

Identifiers

PMID33706419
PMCPMC8273077
OpenAlexW3134056534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.