ArticleMedical physics2021
Reproducibility of lung nodule radiomic features: Multivariable and univariable investigations that account for interactions between CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters.
Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiomics in Lung Cancer Imaging: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Assessing the impact of CT reconstruction kernel on radiomic features extracted from normal and fibrotic tissue in patients with diffuse lung disease.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026Article
- Impact of CT acquisition settings on the stability of radiomic features and the performance of pulmonary nodule classification models.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Vision-language model-based semantic-guided imaging biomarker for lung nodule malignancy prediction.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of unified harmonization of CT images across multiple tasks: A step towards AI generalizability.Medical physics · 2025Article
- ESR Essentials: a step-by-step guide of segmentation for radiologists-practice recommendations by the European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics.European radiology · 2025Review
- Reproducibility and interpretability in radiomics: a critical assessmentDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Review
- Effects of nonstationary system blur on radiomic texture features of trabecular bone in normal and ultra-high resolution CT.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Reproducibility of the CT radiomic features of pulmonary nodules: the effects of the CT reconstruction algorithm, radiation dose, and contrast agent.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluating the robustness of features generated by a foundation model from CT with different reconstruction parameters.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
- Finding Reproducible and Prognostic Radiomic Features in Variable Slice Thickness Contrast Enhanced CT of Colorectal Liver Metastases.The journal of machine learning for biomedical imaging · 2025Article
- Enhancing the prediction ofTranslational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Identification of CT radiomic features robust to acquisition and segmentation variations for improved prediction of radiotherapy-treated lung cancer patient recurrence.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Computed Tomography-derived intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics in predicting EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Expanding Role of Advanced Image Analysis in CT-detected Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules and Early Lung Cancer Characterization.Radiology · 2023Review
- RECIST 1.1 Target Lesion Categorical Response in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Comparison of Conventional versus Volumetric Assessment.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in lung cancer: current applications and perspectives.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Impact of slice thickness on reproducibility of CT radiomic features of lung tumors.F1000Research · 2023Article
- Data harmonisation for information fusion in digital healthcare: A state-of-the-art systematic review, meta-analysis and future research directions.An international journal on information fusion · 2022Article
- Technical note: Evaluation of a V-Net autosegmentation algorithm for pediatric CT scans: Performance, generalizability, and application to patient-specific CT dosimetry.Medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRecent studies have demonstrated a lack of reproducibility of radiomic features in response to variations in CT parameters. In addition, reproducibility of radiomic features has not been well established in clinical datasets. We aimed to investigate the effects of a wide range of CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters on radiomic features in a realistic setting using clinical low dose lung cancer screening cases. We performed univariable and multivariable explorations to consider the effects of individual parameters and the simultaneous interactions between three different acquisition/reconstruction parameters of radiation dose level, reconstructed slice thickness, and kernel.
methodA cohort of 89 lung cancer screening patients were collected that each had a solid lung nodule >4mm diameter. A computational pipeline was used to perform a simulation of dose reduction of the raw projection data, collected from patient scans. This was followed by reconstruction of raw data with weighted filter back projection (wFBP) algorithm and automatic lung nodule detection and segmentation using a computer-aided detection tool. For each patient, 36 different image datasets were created corresponding to dose levels of 100%, 50%, 25%, and 10% of the original dose level, three slice thicknesses of 0.6 mm, 1 mm, and 2 mm, as well as three reconstruction kernels of smooth, medium, and sharp. For each nodule, 226 well-known radiomic features were calculated at each image condition. The reproducibility of radiomic features was first evaluated by measuring the intercondition agreement of the feature values among the 36 image conditions. Then in a series of univariable analyses, the impact of individual CT parameters was assessed by selecting subsets of conditions with one varying and two constant CT parameters. In each subset, intraparameter agreements were assessed. Overall concordance correlation coefficient (OCCC) served as the measure of agreement. An OCCC ≥ 0.9 implied strong agreement and reproducibility of radiomic features in intercondition or intraparameter comparisons. Furthermore, the interaction of CT parameters in impacting radiomic feature values was investigated via ANOVA.
resultsAll included radiomic features lacked intercondition reproducibility (OCCC < 0.9) among all the 36 conditions. Out of 226 radiomic features analyzed, only 17 and 18 features were considered reproducible (OCCC ≥ 0.9) to dose and kernel variation, respectively, within the corresponding condition subsets. Slice thickness demonstrated the largest impact on radiomic feature values where only one to five features were reproducible at a few condition subsets. ANOVA revealed significant interactions (P < 0.05) between CT parameters affecting the variability of >50% of radiomic features.
conclusionWe systematically explored the multidimensional space of CT parameters in affecting lung nodule radiomic features. Univariable and multivariable analyses of this study not only showed the lack of reproducibility of the majority of radiomic features but also revealed existing interactions among CT parameters, meaning that the effect of individual CT parameters on radiomic features can be conditional upon other CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Our findings advise on careful radiomic feature selection and attention to the inclusion criteria for CT image acquisition protocols within the datasets of radiomic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.