Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33705870›Full record

ArticleBrain, behavior, and immunity2021

Interplay between social isolation and loneliness and chronic systemic inflammation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: Results from U-CORONA study.

Yuna Koyama, Nobutoshi Nawa, Yui Yamaoka, Hisaaki Nishimura, Shiro Sonoda, Jin Kuramochi, Yasunari Miyazaki, Takeo Fujiwara

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain, behavior, and immunity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Diminished Social and Leisure Engagement in Community Dwelling-Older Adults with Apathy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuna KoyamaDepartment of Global Health Promotion, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.
Nobutoshi NawaDepartment of Medical Education Research and Development, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.
Yui YamaokaDepartment of Global Health Promotion, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.
Hisaaki NishimuraDepartment of Global Health Promotion, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.
Shiro SonodaKuramochi Clinic Interpark, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.
Jin KuramochiKuramochi Clinic Interpark, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.
Yasunari MiyazakiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.
Takeo FujiwaraDepartment of Global Health Promotion, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: fujiwara.hlth@tmd.ac.jp.
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the face of the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, billions of people were forced to stay at home due to the implementation of social distancing and lockdown policies. As a result, individuals lost their social relationships, leading to social isolation and loneliness. Both social isolation and loneliness are major risk factors for poor physical and mental health status through enhanced chronic inflammation; however, there might be an interplay between social isolation and loneliness on the association with chronic inflammation. We aimed to clarify the link between social relationships and inflammation in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic by distinguishing whether social isolation only, loneliness only, or both were associated with chronic inflammation markers among community-dwelling adults. The data of 624 people (aged 18-92 years, mean 51.4) from the Utsunomiya COVID-19 seROprevalence Neighborhood Association (U-CORONA) study, which targeted randomly sampled households in Utsunomiya city, Japan, were analyzed. Social isolation was assessed as a structural social network by asking the number of social roles they have on a daily basis. Loneliness was measured with the UCLA loneliness scale. As chronic inflammation biomarkers, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the concentration of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured. Generalized estimating equations method was employed to take into account the correlations within households. Isolated-Lonely condition (i.e., being both socially isolated and feeling lonely) was associated with higher NLR among men (B = 0.141, 95%CI = -0.01 to 0.29). Interestingly, Nonisolated-Lonely condition (i.e., not socially isolated but feeling lonely) was associated with lower CRP among women (B = -0.462, 95%CI = -0.82 to -0.10) and among the working-age population (B = -0.495, 95%CI = -0.76 to -0.23). In conclusion, being both socially isolated and feeling lonely was associated with chronic inflammation. Assessing both social isolation and loneliness is critical for proper interventions to mitigate the impact of poor social relationships on health, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansInflammationJapanLonelinessMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesChronic inflammationC-reactive proteinLonelinessNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioSocial isolationSocial relationship

Identifiers

PMID33705870
PMCPMC7939973
OpenAlexW3134602947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.