Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33705727›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2021

Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152: interim results from a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 trial, and 3-month follow-up of a double-blind, randomised phase 1 trial.

Raches Ella, Siddharth Reddy, Harsh Jogdand, Vamshi Sarangi, Brunda Ganneru, Sai Prasad, Dipankar Das, Dugyala Raju, Usha Praturi, Gajanan Sapkal and 16 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 204 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
204citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
22.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

204 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 363 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Raches EllaBharat Biotech, Hyderabad, India.
Siddharth ReddyBharat Biotech, Hyderabad, India.
Harsh JogdandBharat Biotech, Hyderabad, India.
Vamshi SarangiBharat Biotech, Hyderabad, India.
Brunda GanneruBharat Biotech, Hyderabad, India.
Sai PrasadBharat Biotech, Hyderabad, India.
Dipankar DasBharat Biotech, Hyderabad, India.
Dugyala RajuBharat Biotech, Hyderabad, India.
Usha PraturiBharat Biotech, Hyderabad, India.
Gajanan SapkalIndian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Virology, Pune, India.
Pragya YadavIndian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Virology, Pune, India.
Prabhakar ReddyNizams Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Savita VermaPandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, India.
Chandramani SinghAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.
Sagar Vivek RedkarRedkar Hospital, Dargalim, India.
Chandra Sekhar GillurkarGillurkar Hospital, Nagpur, India.
Jitendra Singh KushwahaPrakhar Hospital, Kanpur, India.
Satyajit MohapatraSRM Hospital and Research Centre, Kattankulathur, India.
Amit BhateJeevan Rekha Hospital, Belgaum, India.
Sanjay RaiAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Samiran PandaIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Priya AbrahamIndian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Virology, Pune, India.
Nivedita GuptaIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Krishna EllaBharat Biotech, Hyderabad, India.
Balram BhargavaIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Krishna Mohan VadrevuBharat Biotech, Hyderabad, India. Electronic address: kmohan@bharatbiotech.com.
Bharat Biotech (India) · INICMR-National Institute of Virology · INIndian Council of Medical Research · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INNizam's Institute of Medical Sciences · INPandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INSRM Institute of Science and Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBBV152 is a whole-virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (3 μg or 6 μg) formulated with a toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist molecule (IMDG) adsorbed to alum (Algel). We previously reported findings from a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 1 trial on the safety and immunogenicity of three different formulations of BBV152 (3 μg with Algel-IMDG, 6 μg with Algel-IMDG, or 6 μg with Algel) and one Algel-only control (no antigen), with the first dose administered on day 0 and the second dose on day 14. The 3 μg and 6 μg with Algel-IMDG formulations were selected for this phase 2 study. Herein, we report interim findings of the phase 2 trial on the immunogenicity and safety of BBV152, with the first dose administered on day 0 and the second dose on day 28.

methodsWe did a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of BBV152 in healthy adults and adolescents (aged 12-65 years) at nine hospitals in India. Participants with positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid and serology tests were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 3 μg with Algel-IMDG or 6 μg with Algel-IMDG. Block randomisation was done by use of an interactive web response system. Participants, investigators, study coordinators, study-related personnel, and the sponsor were masked to treatment group allocation. Two intramuscular doses of vaccine were administered on day 0 and day 28. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 wild-type neutralising antibody titres and seroconversion rates (defined as a post-vaccination titre that was at least four-fold higher than the baseline titre) at 4 weeks after the second dose (day 56), measured by use of the plaque-reduction neutralisation test (PRNT

findingsBetween Sept 5 and 12, 2020, 921 participants were screened, of whom 380 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the 3 μg with Algel-IMDG group (n=190) or 6 μg with Algel-IMDG group (n=190). Geometric mean titres (GMTs; PRNT

interpretationIn the phase 1 trial, BBV152 induced high neutralising antibody responses that remained elevated in all participants at 3 months after the second vaccination. In the phase 2 trial, BBV152 showed better reactogenicity and safety outcomes, and enhanced humoral and cell-mediated immune responses compared with the phase 1 trial. The 6 μg with Algel-IMDG formulation has been selected for the phase 3 efficacy trial.

fundingBharat Biotech International. TRANSLATION: For the Hindi translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, NeutralizingChildCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDouble-Blind MethodDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID33705727
PMCPMC8221739
OpenAlexW3135734644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.