Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33705674›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2021

Responses to Auditory Feedback Manipulations in Speech May Be Affected by Previous Exposure to Auditory Errors.

Caroline A Niziolek, Benjamin Parrell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Brain's Sensitivity to Sensory Error Can Be Modulated by Altering Perceived Variability.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Divided Attention Has Limited Effects on Speech Sensorimotor Control.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Do Not Cut Off Your Tail: A Mega-Analysis of Responses to Auditory Perturbation Experiments.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. DIVA Meets EEG: Model Validation Using Formant-Shift Reflex.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caroline A NiziolekDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Benjamin ParrellDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Google (United States) · US

Funding

The role of the cerebellum in speechR01DC017091 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI John Francis Houde, RICHARD IVRY · 2019 to 2026
$4.5M
Role of auditory feedback in speech motor control in Alzheimer's diseaseR01DC017696 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOUDE, JOHN FRANCIS, NAGARAJAN, SRIKANTAN S. · 2018 to 2020
$1.5M
Neural markers of speech error detection and correction abilities in aphasiaR00DC014520 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NIZIOLEK, CAROLINE · 2017 to 2019
$747k
NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC014520NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017091NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Speakers use auditory feedback to guide their speech output, although individuals differ in the magnitude of their compensatory response to perceived errors in feedback. Little is known about the factors that contribute to the compensatory response or how fixed or flexible they are within an individual. Here, we test whether manipulating the perceived reliability of auditory feedback modulates speakers' compensation to auditory perturbations, as predicted by optimal models of sensorimotor control. Method Forty participants produced monosyllabic words in two separate sessions, which differed in the auditory feedback given during an initial exposure phase. In the

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionFeedbackFeedback, SensoryHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID33705674
PMCPMC8740748
OpenAlexW3134096607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.