Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33705570›Full record

ArticleEcology2021

Biotic homogenization destabilizes ecosystem functioning by decreasing spatial asynchrony.

Shaopeng Wang, Michel Loreau, Claire de Mazancourt, Forest Isbell, Carl Beierkuhnlein, John Connolly, Douglas H Deutschman, Jiří Doležal, Nico Eisenhauer, Andy Hector and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Artificial light at night (ALAN) causes shifts in soil communities and functions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Shaopeng WangKey Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9430-8879
Michel LoreauCentre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling, Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS and Paul Sabatier University, Moulis, 09200, France.
Claire de MazancourtCentre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling, Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS and Paul Sabatier University, Moulis, 09200, France.
Forest IsbellDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9689-769X
Carl BeierkuhnleinDepartment of Biogeography, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, 95440, Germany.
John ConnollyUCD School of Mathematics and Statistics, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Douglas H DeutschmanDepartment of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3C5, Canada.
Jiří DoležalDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, 37005, Czech Republic.
Nico EisenhauerGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Andy HectorDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK.
Anke JentschDepartment of Disturbance Ecology, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, 95440, Germany.
Jürgen KreylingExperimental Plant Ecology, Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Greifswald University, Greifswald, 17487, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8489-7289
Vojtech LantaDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, 37005, Czech Republic.
Jan LepšDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, 37005, Czech Republic.
H Wayne PolleyAgricultural Research Service, Grassland, Soil & Water Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Temple, Texas, 76502, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1197-8800
Peter B ReichDepartment of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA.
Jasper van RuijvenPlant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, 6700 AA, The Netherlands.
Bernhard SchmidDepartment of Geography, Remote Sensing Laboratories, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, Zurich, 8057, Switzerland.
David TilmanDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Brian WilseyDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0628-5006
Dylan CravenCentro de Modelación y Monitoreo de Ecosistemas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Mayor, José Toribio Molina 29, Santiago, 8340589, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-3940-833X

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFC0503906National Natural Science Foundation of China 31988102Synthesis Centre of the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig DFG FZT 118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our planet is facing significant changes of biodiversity across spatial scales. Although the negative effects of local biodiversity (α diversity) loss on ecosystem stability are well documented, the consequences of biodiversity changes at larger spatial scales, in particular biotic homogenization, that is, reduced species turnover across space (β diversity), remain poorly known. Using data from 39 grassland biodiversity experiments, we examine the effects of β diversity on the stability of simulated landscapes while controlling for potentially confounding biotic and abiotic factors. Our results show that higher β diversity generates more asynchronous dynamics among local communities and thereby contributes to the stability of ecosystem productivity at larger spatial scales. We further quantify the relative contributions of α and β diversity to ecosystem stability and find a relatively stronger effect of α diversity, possibly due to the limited spatial scale of our experiments. The stabilizing effects of both α and β diversity lead to a positive diversity-stability relationship at the landscape scale. Our findings demonstrate the destabilizing effect of biotic homogenization and suggest that biodiversity should be conserved at multiple spatial scales to maintain the stability of ecosystem functions and services.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystembiotic homogenizationgrassland experimentlandscapescalespatial asynchronyβ diversityγ diversityγ stability

Identifiers

PMID33705570
PMCPMC8244107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.