Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33705555›Full record

ArticleSleep2021

Distinguishing sleep from wake with a radar sensor: a contact-free real-time sleep monitor.

Hanne Siri Amdahl Heglum, Håvard Kallestad, Daniel Vethe, Knut Langsrud, Trond Sand, Morten Engstrøm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluating consumer and clinical sleep technologies: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine update.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hanne Siri Amdahl HeglumDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9684-3835
Håvard KallestadDepartment of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9173-942X
Daniel VetheDepartment of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5028-3457
Knut LangsrudDepartment of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Trond SandDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9755-8187
Morten EngstrømDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work aimed to evaluate whether a radar sensor can distinguish sleep from wakefulness in real time. The sensor detects body movements without direct physical contact with the subject and can be embedded in the roof of a hospital room for completely unobtrusive monitoring. We conducted simultaneous recordings with polysomnography, actigraphy, and radar on two groups: healthy young adults (n = 12, four nights per participant) and patients referred to a sleep examination (n = 28, one night per participant). We developed models for sleep/wake classification based on principles commonly used by actigraphy, including real-time models, and tested them on both datasets. We estimated a set of commonly reported sleep parameters from these data, including total-sleep-time, sleep-onset-latency, sleep-efficiency, and wake-after-sleep-onset, and evaluated the inter-method reliability of these estimates. Classification results were on-par with, or exceeding, those often seen for actigraphy. For real-time models in healthy young adults, accuracies were above 92%, sensitivities above 95%, specificities above 83%, and all Cohen's kappa values were above 0.81 compared to polysomnography. For patients referred to a sleep examination, accuracies were above 81%, sensitivities about 89%, specificities above 53%, and Cohen's kappa values above 0.44. Sleep variable estimates showed no significant intermethod bias, but the limits of agreement were quite wide for the group of patients referred to a sleep examination. Our results indicate that the radar has the potential to offer the benefits of contact-free real-time monitoring of sleep, both for in-patients and for ambulatory home monitoring.

Indexed as

RadarSleepActigraphyHumansPolysomnographyReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultactigraphyambulatory home monitoringpolysomnographyradarsleepsleep monitoring

Identifiers

PMID33705555
PMCPMC8361351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.