Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33705471›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Planning for work: Exploring the relationship between contraceptive use and women's sector-specific employment in India.

Lotus McDougal, Abhishek Singh, Kaushalendra Kumar, Nabamallika Dehingia, Aluisio J D Barros, Fernanda Ewerling, Yamini Atmavilas, Anita Raj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lotus McDougalCenter on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3002-0489
Abhishek SinghInternational Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6263-4410
Kaushalendra KumarInternational Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Nabamallika DehingiaCenter on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Aluisio J D BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Fernanda EwerlingInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Yamini AtmavilasBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Anita RajCenter on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the health-related benefits of contraceptive use for women are well documented, potential social benefits, including enabling women's employment, have not been well researched. We examine the relationship between contraceptive use and women's employment in India, a country where both factors have remained relatively static over the past ten years. We use data from India's 2015-16 National Family Health Survey to test the association between current contraceptive use (none, sterilization, IUD, condom, pill, rhythm method or withdrawal) and current employment status (none, professional, clerical or sales, agricultural, services or production) with multivariable, multinomial regression; variable selection was guided by a directed acyclic graph. More than three-quarters of women in this sample were currently using contraception; sterilization was most common. Women who were sterilized or chose traditional contraception, relative to those not using contraception, were more likely to be employed in the agricultural and production sectors, versus not being employed (sterilization adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR] = 1.5, p<0.001 for both agricultural and production sectors; rhythm aRRR = 1.5, p = 0.01 for agriculture; withdrawal aRRR = 1.5, p = 0.02 for production). In contrast, women with IUDs, compared to those who not using contraception, were more likely to be employed in the professional sector versus not being employed (aRRR = 1.9, p = 0.01). The associations between current contraceptive use and employment were heterogeneous across methods and sectors, though in no case was contraceptive use significantly associated with lower relative probabilities of employment. Policies designed to support women's access to contraception should consider the sector-specific employment of the populations they target.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorEducational StatusEmploymentAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIndiaMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID33705471
PMCPMC7951869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.