ReviewPloS one2021
Trends and gaps in the use of citizen science derived data as input for species distribution models: A quantitative review.
Review in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Species distribution models predict genome-wide polymorphism and gene flow in an endangered amphibian.Heredity · 2026Article
- Computer Vision for Monitoring Wild Bees and Wasps: A Structured Literature Review.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Anthropogenic accessibility and observer inequality dictate spatial biodiversity patterns in Malaysia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Current Protections and Future Threats to Say's Spiketail Habitat in the Southeastern USA.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- How the Choice of Spatial Resolution Affects Freshwater Fish Species Distribution Models.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- From least concerned to endangered? An integrated approach to determine the distribution, suitable habitat, and future of Dryophytes immaculatus.BMC zoology · 2026Article
- Article
- Climate change may increase the suitable habitats for invasive freshwater cichlids in a Neotropical basin.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assessing Changes in Grassland Species Distribution at the Landscape Scale Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- iNaturalist accelerates biodiversity research.Bioscience · 2025Article
- Urbanization Drives Habitat Suitability of the Invasive Cuban Knight Anole (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Incorporating citizen science into IUCN Red List assessments.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Forecasting Range Shifts in Terrestrial Alpine Insects Under Global Warming.Ecology and evolution · 2025Review
- Predicting the invasiveness of alpine newts in the UK.Biological invasions · 2025Article
- Combining acoustic survey and citizen science data yields enhanced species distribution models for tropical rainforest birds.PloS one · 2025Article
- Buzzing towards Resilience: Investigating the Spatial Alignment of the Desert Pallid Bee,Insects · 2024Article
- Boosting biodiversity monitoring using smartphone-driven, rapidly accumulating community-sourced data.eLife · 2024Article
- Extracting secondary data from citizen science images reveals host flower preferences of the Mexican grass-carrying waspEcology and evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Citizen science (CS) currently refers to the participation of non-scientist volunteers in any discipline of conventional scientific research. Over the last two decades, nature-based CS has flourished due to innovative technology, novel devices, and widespread digital platforms used to collect and classify species occurrence data. For scientists, CS offers a low-cost approach of collecting species occurrence information at large spatial scales that otherwise would be prohibitively expensive. We examined the trends and gaps linked to the use of CS as a source of data for species distribution models (SDMs), in order to propose guidelines and highlight solutions. We conducted a quantitative literature review of 207 peer-reviewed articles to measure how the representation of different taxa, regions, and data types have changed in SDM publications since the 2010s. Our review shows that the number of papers using CS for SDMs has increased at approximately double the rate of the overall number of SDM papers. However, disparities in taxonomic and geographic coverage remain in studies using CS. Western Europe and North America were the regions with the most coverage (73%). Papers on birds (49%) and mammals (19.3%) outnumbered other taxa. Among invertebrates, flying insects including Lepidoptera, Odonata and Hymenoptera received the most attention. Discrepancies between research interest and availability of data were as especially important for amphibians, reptiles and fishes. Compared to studies on animal taxa, papers on plants using CS data remain rare. Although the aims and scope of papers are diverse, species conservation remained the central theme of SDM using CS data. We present examples of the use of CS and highlight recommendations to motivate further research, such as combining multiple data sources and promoting local and traditional knowledge. We hope our findings will strengthen citizen-researchers partnerships to better inform SDMs, especially for less-studied taxa and regions. Researchers stand to benefit from the large quantity of data available from CS sources to improve global predictions of species distributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.